Bible Commentary

Romans 7:7-13

Matthew Henry on Romans 7:7-13

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

There is no way of coming to that knowledge of sin, which is necessary to repentance, and therefore to peace and pardon, but by trying our hearts and lives by the law. In his own case the apostle would not have known the sinfulness of his thoughts, motives, and actions, but by the law.

That perfect standard showed how wrong his heart and life were, proving his sins to be more numerous than he had before thought, but it did not contain any provision of mercy or grace for his relief.

He is ignorant of human nature and the perverseness of his own heart, who does not perceive in himself a readiness to fancy there is something desirable in what is out of reach. We may perceive this in our children, though self-love makes us blind to it in ourselves.

The more humble and spiritual any Christian is, the more clearly will he perceive that the apostle describes the true believer, from his first convictions of sin to his greatest progress in grace, during this present imperfect state.

St. Paul was once a Pharisee, ignorant of the spirituality of the law, having some correctness of character, without knowing his inward depravity. When the commandment came to his conscience by the convictions of the Holy Spirit, and he saw what it demanded, he found his sinful mind rise against it.

He felt at the same time the evil of sin, his own sinful state, that he was unable to fulfil the law, and was like a criminal when condemned. But though the evil principle in the human heart produces sinful motions, and the more by taking occasion of the commandment; yet the law is holy, and the commandment holy, just, and good.

It is not favourable to sin, which it pursues into the heart, and discovers and reproves in the inward motions thereof. Nothing is so good but a corrupt and vicious nature will pervert it. The same heat that softens wax, hardens clay.

Food or medicine when taken wrong, may cause death, though its nature is to nourish or to heal. The law may cause death through man's depravity, but sin is the poison that brings death. Not the law, but sin discovered by the law, was made death to the apostle.

The ruinous nature of sin, and the sinfulness of the human heart, are here clearly shown.

Recommended reading

More for Romans 7:7-13

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-25Romans 7:1-25 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-17Romans 7:1-17 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe position of the Law under the New Testament. The apostle is here continuing his discussion of the immoral suggestion to which he alluded in the previous chapter (Romans 7:15), "What then? shall we sin, because we ar…Excellency of the Law; Usefulness of the Law. (a. d. 58.)Romans 7:7-14 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleEXCELLENCY OF THE LAW; USEFULNESS OF THE LAW. (A. D. 58.) To what he had said in the former paragraph, the apostle here raises an objection, which he answers very fully: What shall we say then? Is the law sin? When he h…The Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:7-13Romans 7:7-13 · The Pulpit CommentaryIs the Law sin? "The sinful passions, which were through the Law" (Romans 7:5). What does the Law bring forth such fruit? Is the LAW SIN? Nay, that cannot be; on the contrary, we all acknowledge it, without dispute, as…The Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:7-25Romans 7:7-25 · The Pulpit Commentary(b) The relation of law to sin, and how law prepares the soul for emancipation in Christ from the dominion of sin. In the section of the argument which begins at Romans 7:1 we have seen that the idea of being under sin…The Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:7Romans 7:7 · The Pulpit CommentaryWhat shall we say then? (St. Paul's usual phrase, with μὴ γένοιτο following, for meeting and rejecting a possible misunderstanding of his meaning; cf. Romans 6:1.) Is the Law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known Bin,…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-25EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-17The position of the Law under the New Testament. The apostle is here continuing his discussion of the immoral suggestion to which he alluded in the previous chapter (Romans 7:15), "What then? shall we sin, because we ar…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryExcellency of the Law; Usefulness of the Law. (a. d. 58.)EXCELLENCY OF THE LAW; USEFULNESS OF THE LAW. (A. D. 58.) To what he had said in the former paragraph, the apostle here raises an objection, which he answers very fully: What shall we say then? Is the law sin? When he h…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:7What shall we say then? (St. Paul's usual phrase, with μὴ γένοιτο following, for meeting and rejecting a possible misunderstanding of his meaning; cf. Romans 6:1.) Is the Law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known Bin,…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:7-11Knowledge of sin through Law. The strong language in which the apostle exulted in the believer's discharge from the Law might easily be misunderstood, and give offence to Jewish readers. It seemed to throw the onus of m…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:7Knowledge of sin by the Law. Although the apostle aimed in this Epistle to show that the Law by itself was unable and unfitted to secure men's salvation, it is evident, both that he honoured the Law as an expression of…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:7-13The work of the Law in awakening the soul. After the general statement about the two marriages of the soul, the apostle proceeds to exhibit the soul in its unregenerate state, and how it is awakened through Law to a sen…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:7-13Is the Law sin? "The sinful passions, which were through the Law" (Romans 7:5). What does the Law bring forth such fruit? Is the LAW SIN? Nay, that cannot be; on the contrary, we all acknowledge it, without dispute, as…Joseph S. Exell and contributors