Bible Commentary

Genesis 3:1

The Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Now (literally, and) the serpent. Nachash, from nachash—

(a) To make naked; whence atom, plural arumim, naked ().

(b) To crafty (). If applied to the serpent in the sense of πανοῦ ργος (Aquila, Keil, Lange, Macdonald),

it can only be either

Unto the woman. As the weaker of the two, and more likely to be easily persuaded (; ). Cf. Satan's assault on Job through his wife (). Milton's idea that Eve desired to be independent, and had withdrawn herself out of Adam's sight, it has been well remarked, "sets up a beginning of the fall before the fall itself" (Lunge). Yea. אַף כּי. Is it even so that? (Gesenius). Is it really so that! (Ewald, Furst, Keil). Etiamne, vel Itane (Calvin). A question either

And the woman said unto the serpent. Neither afraid of the reptile, there being not yet any enmity among the creatures; nor astonished at his speaking, perhaps as being not yet fully acquainted with the capabilities of the lower animals; nor suspicions of his designs, her innocence and inexperience not predisposing her to apprehend danger. Yet the tenor of the reptile's interrogation was fitted to excite alarm; and if, as some conjecture, she understood that Satan was the speaker, she should at once have taken flight; while, if she knew nothing of him or his disposition, she should not have opened herself so freely to a person unknown. "The woman certainly discovers some uuadvisedness in entertaining conference with the serpent, in matters of so great importance, in so familiar a manner" (White). We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden.

Recommended reading

More for Genesis 3:1

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Genesis 3:1-5Genesis 3:1-5 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentarySatan assaulted our first parents, to draw them to sin, and the temptation proved fatal to them. The tempter was the devil, in the shape and likeness of a serpent. Satan's plan was to draw our first parents to sin, and…The Tempter's Subtlety; The Tempter's Importunity (b. c. 4004.)Genesis 3:1-5 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE TEMPTER'S SUBTLETY; THE TEMPTER'S IMPORTUNITY (B. C. 4004.) We have here an account of the temptation with which Satan assaulted our first parents, to draw them into sin, and which proved fatal to them. Here observe…The Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7Genesis 3:1-7 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7Genesis 3:1-7 · The Pulpit CommentaryHow long the paradisiacal state of innocence and felicity continued the historian does not declare, probably as not falling within the scope of his immediate design. Psalms 49:12 has been thought, though without suffici…The Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1Genesis 3:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe tempter. I. WHO TEMPTS? 1. Not the mere serpent. 2. A higher power of evil. 3. This higher power a person. 4. The leader of the fallen angels. II. WHY PERMITTED? Easy to see why moved; why permitted, a mystery. But…The Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7Genesis 3:1-7 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe moral chaos before the moral restoration. Hitherto the moral nature of man may be said to be absorbed in his religious nature. He has held intercourse with his Creator. He has ruled earth as "the paragon of animals.…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Genesis 3:1-5Satan assaulted our first parents, to draw them to sin, and the temptation proved fatal to them. The tempter was the devil, in the shape and likeness of a serpent. Satan's plan was to draw our first parents to sin, and…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Tempter's Subtlety; The Tempter's Importunity (b. c. 4004.)THE TEMPTER'S SUBTLETY; THE TEMPTER'S IMPORTUNITY (B. C. 4004.) We have here an account of the temptation with which Satan assaulted our first parents, to draw them into sin, and which proved fatal to them. Here observe…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7The moral chaos before the moral restoration. Hitherto the moral nature of man may be said to be absorbed in his religious nature. He has held intercourse with his Creator. He has ruled earth as "the paragon of animals.…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1The tempter. I. WHO TEMPTS? 1. Not the mere serpent. 2. A higher power of evil. 3. This higher power a person. 4. The leader of the fallen angels. II. WHY PERMITTED? Easy to see why moved; why permitted, a mystery. But…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7How long the paradisiacal state of innocence and felicity continued the historian does not declare, probably as not falling within the scope of his immediate design. Psalms 49:12 has been thought, though without suffici…Joseph S. Exell and contributorssermonWhere Art Thou?” — Dwight L. Moody (1800s)Dwight L. Moody (1800s)