Bible Commentary

Leviticus 22:14

The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:14

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

As the sacrificial meals made a part of the stipends of the priestly body, any one who inadvertently took a share in them by eating of the holy thing unwittingly, when he had no right to do so, had to refund the value of the meat, with one fifth, that is, twenty percent, added to it. He thus acknowledged that he had "committed a trespass in the holy things of the Lord," the case falling under the rule given in , , "And he shall make amends for the harm that he hath done in the holy thing, and shall add the fifth part thereto, and give it unto the priest." In the fifth chapter a trespass offering of a ram is also ordered, which, though not specified, is probably understood here also.

These verses present some difficulties of construction. The rendering of the Authorized Version is as follows: And they shall not profane the holy things of the children of Israel, which they offer unto the Lord; or suffer them to bear the iniquity of trespass, when they eat their holy things: for I the Lord do sanctify them. If this rendering is accepted, it would mean that the priests are not to profane the holy things by any irregularity on their part as to the eating of them, nor to suffer laymen to incur the guilt of a trespass by eating them. The marginal rendering, which is to be preferred, gives the passage as follows: And they shall not profane the holy things of the children of Israel, which they offer unto the Lord; or lade themselves with the iniquity of trespass in their eating. According to this translation, the meaning would be that laymen (who had been spoken of in the previous verse) should not profane the holy things, or become guilty of a trespass (as defined in ) by eating them. Technically and literally, David was guilty of this trespass in an aggravated form, when he and his followers ate the shewbread at Nob (1혻Samuel 21:6), for the shewbread was not only holy, but most holy. But his act is excused by our Lord, on the plea of necessity (, ), even though it was done on the sabbath day.

Recommended reading

More for Leviticus 22:14

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Leviticus 22:1-33Leviticus 22:1-33 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryIn this chapter we have divers laws concerning the priests and sacrifices, all for preserving the honour of the sanctuary. Let us recollect with gratitude that our great High Priest cannot be hindered by any thing from…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:1-33Leviticus 22:1-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION This chapter, which is a continuation of Leviticus 21:1-24,The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:1-16Leviticus 22:1-16 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe eating of the holy things. We have seen, in the preceding chapter, that blemishes which precluded a priest from ministering at the altar did not hinder him from eating of the holy things. The ordinary Israelite, the…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:1-33Leviticus 22:1-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryHoliness of priests and sacrifices. While much that appertained only to a temporary dispensation, still great principles included in the formal regulations, as?? I. RELIGION SANCTIFIES, preserves, and perfects the whole…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:1-33Leviticus 22:1-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryPriestly disqualifications. cf. Matthew 25:31-46. We saw that inherited infirmity, such as is mentioned in Matthew 25:18-21 of last chapter, while it excludes from office, does not exclude from sustenance. We now come a…Matthew Henry on Leviticus 22:10-16Leviticus 22:10-16 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleThe holy things were to be eaten by the priests and their families. Now, I. Here is a law that no stranger should eat of them, that is, no person whatsoever but the priests only, and those that pertained to them, Leviti…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Leviticus 22:1-33In this chapter we have divers laws concerning the priests and sacrifices, all for preserving the honour of the sanctuary. Let us recollect with gratitude that our great High Priest cannot be hindered by any thing from…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:1-16The eating of the holy things. We have seen, in the preceding chapter, that blemishes which precluded a priest from ministering at the altar did not hinder him from eating of the holy things. The ordinary Israelite, the…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:1-33EXPOSITION This chapter, which is a continuation of Leviticus 21:1-24,Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:1-33Holiness of priests and sacrifices. While much that appertained only to a temporary dispensation, still great principles included in the formal regulations, as?? I. RELIGION SANCTIFIES, preserves, and perfects the whole…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:1-33Priestly disqualifications. cf. Matthew 25:31-46. We saw that inherited infirmity, such as is mentioned in Matthew 25:18-21 of last chapter, while it excludes from office, does not exclude from sustenance. We now come a…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Leviticus 22:10-16The holy things were to be eaten by the priests and their families. Now, I. Here is a law that no stranger should eat of them, that is, no person whatsoever but the priests only, and those that pertained to them, Leviti…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 22:10-15The guilt of profanation. That which had been offered in sacrifice was "holy unto the Lord;" these were "holy things" (Leviticus 22:10); "I the Lord do sanctify them" (Leviticus 22:16). They might only be partaken of by…Joseph S. Exell and contributors