EXPOSITION
THE SECOND MUSTERING (Numbers 26:1-65).
Bible Commentary
Numbers 26:1-65
The Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:1-65
The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain
Recommended reading
More for Numbers 26:1-65
Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.
Other commentaries
Matthew Henry on Numbers 26:1-51Numbers 26:1-51 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryMoses did not number the people but when God commanded him. We have here the families registered, as well as the tribes. The total was nearly the same as when numbered at mount Sinai. Notice is here taken of the childre…The Numbering of the People. (b. c. 1452.)Numbers 26:1-4 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE NUMBERING OF THE PEOPLE. (B. C. 1452.) Observe here, 1. That Moses did not number the people but when God commanded him. David in his time did it without a command, and paid dearly for it. God was Israel's king, and…The Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:1Numbers 26:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryIt came to pass after the plague. This plague was the last event which seriously diminished the numbers of the Israelites; perhaps it was the last event which diminished them at all, for it seems to be throughout implie…The Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:1-65Numbers 26:1-65 · The Pulpit CommentaryTHE FINAL NUMBERING OF THE ELECT Both the numberings of the children of Israel are to be spiritually interpreted of that knowledge which God has of his elect, and of their inscription in the registers of life. The peopl…The Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:1-62Numbers 26:1-62 · The Pulpit CommentaryTHE SECOND CENSUS I. THE PURPOSE OF IT. 1. The number of those able to go to war in Israel had still to be ascertained. Though the people are now reposing in unaccustomed and grateful quietude, with the promised Canaan…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Numbers 26:1-51Moses did not number the people but when God commanded him. We have here the families registered, as well as the tribes. The total was nearly the same as when numbered at mount Sinai. Notice is here taken of the childre…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Numbering of the People. (b. c. 1452.)THE NUMBERING OF THE PEOPLE. (B. C. 1452.) Observe here, 1. That Moses did not number the people but when God commanded him. David in his time did it without a command, and paid dearly for it. God was Israel's king, and…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:1-65THE FINAL NUMBERING OF THE ELECT Both the numberings of the children of Israel are to be spiritually interpreted of that knowledge which God has of his elect, and of their inscription in the registers of life. The peopl…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:1It came to pass after the plague. This plague was the last event which seriously diminished the numbers of the Israelites; perhaps it was the last event which diminished them at all, for it seems to be throughout implie…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:1-62THE SECOND CENSUS I. THE PURPOSE OF IT. 1. The number of those able to go to war in Israel had still to be ascertained. Though the people are now reposing in unaccustomed and grateful quietude, with the promised Canaan…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:2Take the sum of all the congregation. This was certainly not commanded with a view to the war against Midian, which was of no military importance, and was actually prosecuted with no more than 12,000 men (Numbers 31:5).…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:3Spake with them, i.e; no doubt with the responsible chiefs, who must have assisted in this census, as in the previous one (Numbers 1:4), although the fact is not mentioned.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Numbers 26:4Take the sum of the people. These words are not in the text, but axe borrowed from Numbers 26:2. Nothing is set down in the original but the brief instruction given to the census-takers—"from twenty years old and upward…Joseph S. Exell and contributors