Bible Commentary

Deuteronomy 21:15-17

The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-17

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

The rights of the firstborn in the house of a bigamist.

Bigamy was not encouraged by the Mosaic Law. Where it took place in man's passion, the Law stepped in to regulate the relations in the household impartially. The house of a bigamist may be the scene of sudden jealousies and dispeace, but God steps in to forbid it being the scene of injustice. The discomfort is providentially inseparable from the bigamy—it would have been a pity had it been otherwise! But the Lord steps in to prevent flagrant injustice being done to the children solely through the father's caprice. Caprice may be permitted up to a certain point, with all its painful checks, but it will not be suffered to perpetuate undeserved wrong.

I. THE RIGHTS OF THE FIRSTBORN CONSISTED IN A DOUBLE SHARE OF THE FAMILY PROPERTY—TWICE AS MUCH AS THE OTHER CHILDREN. This was that he, as the beginning of his father's strength, and as acknowledged head of the family, might be able to sustain its honor properly. It was for this portion Elisha prayed when he desired a double portion of Elijah's spirit; not twice as much, but twice as much as the other sons of the prophets (). And this is what Jesus gets from the Father, according to the promise, "I will make him my Firstborn, higher than the kings of the earth" (). There was another right of the firstborn, in having a seed raised up for him in case of his premature decease. This also has its import in the case of Jesus.

II. BECAUSE A FIRSTBORN'S MOTHER WAS HATED WAS NO REASON WHY HE SHOULD BE DENIED HIS RIGHTS. The dark cloud of hate was not to envelop him, and keep him out of his double portion, or his right to a seed, if he prematurely died. And yet this was what Jesus received in the way of treatment. "He came unto his own, and his own received him not." As the Firstborn of humanity, he deserved the double portion, yet had not where to lay his head. He was denied his rights among men.

III. FROM THE CAPRICE OF MEN WE MAY ALWAYS LOOK UP TO THE IMPARTIAL JUSTICE OF GOD. This was the protection of the firstborn in the house of a bigamist. God was on his side. This was the protection of Jesus amid the injustice of men—the Father was along with him. He always did what pleased him. And whenever we feel aggrieved through the capricious conduct of our fellows, let us always look up confidingly to our Father above.

The Lord is just, at all events. We may rely on his vindication of our case in the great day, if not before.—R.M.E.

Recommended reading

More for Deuteronomy 21:15-17

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:1-23Deuteronomy 21:1-23 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION EXPIATION OF UNCERTAIN MURDER. TREATMENT OF A CAPTIVE TAKEN TO WIFE. RIGHTS OF THE FIRSTBORN. A REBELLIOUS, REFRACTORY SON TO BE JUDGED AND PUNISHED. A MALEFACTOR WHO HAS BEEN HANGED TO BE BURIED ERE NIGHTFAL…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:10-15Deuteronomy 21:10-15 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe captive wife. The kindness, thoughtfulness, and strict justice of the Mosaic laws is very striking. The Law here interposes to secure— I. CONSIDERATE TREATMENT OF ONE BEREAVED. (Deuteronomy 21:10-14.) The case suppo…Matthew Henry on Deuteronomy 21:15-17Deuteronomy 21:15-17 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThis law restrains men from disinheriting their eldest sons without just cause. The principle in this case as to children, is still binding to parents; they must give children their right without partiality.The Right of the Firstborn. (b. c. 1451.)Deuteronomy 21:15-17 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE RIGHT OF THE FIRSTBORN. (B. C. 1451.) This law restrains men from disinheriting their eldest sons out of mere caprice, and without just provocation. I. The case here put (Deuteronomy 21:15) is very instructive. 1. I…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-18Deuteronomy 21:15-18 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe firstborn of the hated wife. The firstborn, in patriarchal and tribal societies, had recognized rights and honors, correlative with the duties and responsibilities which his position as prospective head of the house…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-17Deuteronomy 21:15-17 · The Pulpit CommentaryIf a man have two wives, one of whom is a favorite and the other disliked, and if his firstborn son be the child of the latter, he is not to allow his love for the other to prejudice the right of the son, but must allow…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:1-23EXPOSITION EXPIATION OF UNCERTAIN MURDER. TREATMENT OF A CAPTIVE TAKEN TO WIFE. RIGHTS OF THE FIRSTBORN. A REBELLIOUS, REFRACTORY SON TO BE JUDGED AND PUNISHED. A MALEFACTOR WHO HAS BEEN HANGED TO BE BURIED ERE NIGHTFAL…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:10-15The captive wife. The kindness, thoughtfulness, and strict justice of the Mosaic laws is very striking. The Law here interposes to secure— I. CONSIDERATE TREATMENT OF ONE BEREAVED. (Deuteronomy 21:10-14.) The case suppo…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Deuteronomy 21:15-17This law restrains men from disinheriting their eldest sons without just cause. The principle in this case as to children, is still binding to parents; they must give children their right without partiality.Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Right of the Firstborn. (b. c. 1451.)THE RIGHT OF THE FIRSTBORN. (B. C. 1451.) This law restrains men from disinheriting their eldest sons out of mere caprice, and without just provocation. I. The case here put (Deuteronomy 21:15) is very instructive. 1. I…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-18The firstborn of the hated wife. The firstborn, in patriarchal and tribal societies, had recognized rights and honors, correlative with the duties and responsibilities which his position as prospective head of the house…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-17If a man have two wives, one of whom is a favorite and the other disliked, and if his firstborn son be the child of the latter, he is not to allow his love for the other to prejudice the right of the son, but must allow…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-17Home partialities never to warp home justice. This paragraph indicates deep insight into human nature, and a far-seeing wisdom which surely indicates its superhuman origin. It is designed to restrict the action of the f…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-17Monogamy essential to domestic peace. Every indication of God's will is a finger-post to felicity. A wise man will not wait for peremptory law. The faintest whisper of Jehovah's will is law to him. Without doubt, that e…Joseph S. Exell and contributors