Bible Commentary

Deuteronomy 21:18-23

The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:18-23

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Parental authority enforced.

It is plain that parents are to deal with their children to the best of their ability: but in case a stubborn and rebellious son would not hearken to father or mother, would not appreciate chastisement, and had become a drunkard and glutton, then the parents were directed to bring the case before the elders of the city, and the impenitent, licentious son was to be taken away from the earth by public stoning. The public law was thus, in the last resort, to back up parental authority and to remove the "scapegrace."

I. PARENTAL AUTHORITY IS TO BE EXERCISED TO THE UTMOST. Father and mother are both to do their best to save their son from being a public disgrace. They are to use the rod, to chasten him, if nothing milder will do. Only after they have prosecuted their parental authority to the last degree are they to seek the public officers.

II. GLUTTONY AND DRUNKENNESS ARE TREATED AS CAPITAL OFFENCES UNDER THE THEOCRACY. They are incompatible with membership in God's kingdom. Hence they are deemed worthy of death. Because they are not now so severely visited by public law does not imply that they are less heinous in God's sight than they were then.

III. IT MUST HAVE BEEN THE LAST RESORT WHEN PARENTS WOULD BRING FORTH THEIR SON FOR PUBLIC EXECUTION. What a wearying of love and patience there must have been before such a commandment as this would be carried out! The father and mother would bear long before they would bring themselves to make of their child a public infamy.

IV. THE EXECUTION OF THE SCAPEGRACE WAS A SOLEMN DEDICATION OF HIM, BY IMPOSITION OF HANDS, TO DEATH BY STONING. Such a public disgrace must have had a very wholesome effect in deterring reckless children from self-abandonment. We do not hear of any instance of such an execution. Drunkenness and gluttony were not common crimes in Israel.

V. IT WOULD SEEM THAT GIBBETING WAS ADDED TO THE STONING, TO EMPHASIZE STILL MORE THE DISGRACE IN SUCH CASES. When this was carried out, it was understood that the gibbeted person was taken down at sundown, so as not to defile the land, and was buried without delay. As accursed of God, the corpse was as soon as possible put out of sight into the tomb.

VI. IT IS INSTRUCTIVE TO THINK OF JESUS CHRIST BEING EXPOSED TO JUST SUCH A PUBLIC INFAMY. He was made a curse for us. He was hanged on a tree, gibbeted as a malefactor. What love led him to place himself in such a position! The authorities took him, and in his Father's and mother's presence they did him to death, as if he bad been a disobedient and disgraceful Son. Thus did he deliver us from the curse of the Law. We receive honor because he accepted shame. The "holy Child Jesus" was nailed to the cross, was suspended on a tree, as if he were accursed of God. May we all profit by his voluntary humiliation, and imitate him as the holy, consecrated Child!—R.M.E.

HOMILIES BY J. ORR

Recommended reading

More for Deuteronomy 21:18-23

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:1-23Deuteronomy 21:1-23 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION EXPIATION OF UNCERTAIN MURDER. TREATMENT OF A CAPTIVE TAKEN TO WIFE. RIGHTS OF THE FIRSTBORN. A REBELLIOUS, REFRACTORY SON TO BE JUDGED AND PUNISHED. A MALEFACTOR WHO HAS BEEN HANGED TO BE BURIED ERE NIGHTFAL…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-18Deuteronomy 21:15-18 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe firstborn of the hated wife. The firstborn, in patriarchal and tribal societies, had recognized rights and honors, correlative with the duties and responsibilities which his position as prospective head of the house…Matthew Henry on Deuteronomy 21:18-21Deuteronomy 21:18-21 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryObserve how the criminal is here described. He is a stubborn and rebellious son. No child was to fare the worse for weakness of capacity, slowness, or dulness, but for wilfulness and obstinacy. Nothing draws men into al…Punishment of a Rebellious Son; Burial of Malefactors. (b. c. 1451.)Deuteronomy 21:18-23 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BiblePUNISHMENT OF A REBELLIOUS SON; BURIAL OF MALEFACTORS. (B. C. 1451.) Here is, I. A law for the punishing of a rebellious son. Having in the former law provided that parents should not deprive their children of their rig…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:18-21Deuteronomy 21:18-21 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe rebellious son. A law of this kind, which left it to the parents themselves to impeach their disobedient son, while ordaining that, when the charge was proved against him, and it could be shown that the parents had…The Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:18-21Deuteronomy 21:18-21 · The Pulpit CommentaryIf a son was refractory and unmanageable by his parents, if, given to sensual indulgence, he would yield neither to reproof nor to chastisement,—the parents were to lay hold on him, and lead him to the ciders of the tow…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:1-23EXPOSITION EXPIATION OF UNCERTAIN MURDER. TREATMENT OF A CAPTIVE TAKEN TO WIFE. RIGHTS OF THE FIRSTBORN. A REBELLIOUS, REFRACTORY SON TO BE JUDGED AND PUNISHED. A MALEFACTOR WHO HAS BEEN HANGED TO BE BURIED ERE NIGHTFAL…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:15-18The firstborn of the hated wife. The firstborn, in patriarchal and tribal societies, had recognized rights and honors, correlative with the duties and responsibilities which his position as prospective head of the house…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Deuteronomy 21:18-21Observe how the criminal is here described. He is a stubborn and rebellious son. No child was to fare the worse for weakness of capacity, slowness, or dulness, but for wilfulness and obstinacy. Nothing draws men into al…Matthew HenrycommentaryPunishment of a Rebellious Son; Burial of Malefactors. (b. c. 1451.)PUNISHMENT OF A REBELLIOUS SON; BURIAL OF MALEFACTORS. (B. C. 1451.) Here is, I. A law for the punishing of a rebellious son. Having in the former law provided that parents should not deprive their children of their rig…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:18-21A slippery path to ruin. It is of the first importance that a child should begin life well. A twist in the young stem will develop into a gnarled and crooked tree. A slight divergence at the outset of a voyage may end i…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:18-21A bad son a State peril. This is a very remarkable provision. It is based on the well-known fact that there are some who need a strong deterrent to keep them from being a plague and peril to a State, and also on the all…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:18-21If a son was refractory and unmanageable by his parents, if, given to sensual indulgence, he would yield neither to reproof nor to chastisement,—the parents were to lay hold on him, and lead him to the ciders of the tow…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Deuteronomy 21:18-21The rebellious son. A law of this kind, which left it to the parents themselves to impeach their disobedient son, while ordaining that, when the charge was proved against him, and it could be shown that the parents had…Joseph S. Exell and contributors