The Pulpit Commentary on Ezra 2:1-67

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

EXPOSITION

THE NUMBER OF THOSE WHO RETURNED FROM CAPTIVITY WITH ZERUBBABEL, AND THE NAMES OF THE CHIEFS (Ezra 2:1-64). It has been argued that the whole of this chapter is out of place here, and has been transferred hither from Nehemiah (Nehemiah 7:6-73), where it occupies its rightful position (Bishop A. Hervey). According to this view, the list is one embodying the results of the census made by Nehemiah, not a list of those who returned to Jerusalem with Zerubbabel But it seems strange that such a theory should ever have been seriously maintained, since not only does Ezra declare the list to be a catalogue of those "which came with Zerubbabel" (verse 2), but Nehemiah himself warns us that it is "a register of the genealogy of them which came up at the first" (Nell 7.5). The Jews, like other Semitic races, especially the Arabs, set great store by their genealogies; and, to secure a sound basis for these in the restored community, it was essential that a correct record should be kept of the families by which the state was re-established. Already there was a large number of Jews among the captives "which could not show their father's house, or their pedigree, whether they were of Israel" (verse 59). It was essential, according to Jewish ideas, that such ignorance should, at the least, be arrested, and not spread through the nation. Hence the elaborate genealogies with which the first Book of Chronicles opens (1Ch. 1-8), and hence also the present list.

The list may be divided into ten parts:—

1. Enumeration of the leaders (verse 2).

2. Numbers of those who returned, arranged according to families (verses 3-19).

3. Numbers of those who returned, arranged according to localities (verses 20-35).

4. Numbers of the priests, arranged according to families (verses 36-39).

5. Numbers of the Levites, arranged similarly (verses 40-42).

6. Families of the Nethinim (verses 43-54).

7. Families of "Solomon's servants" (verses 55-57).

8. Number of these last two classes together (verse 58).

9. Account of those who could not show their genealogy (verses 59-63).

10. General summation (verse 64).

More for Ezra 2:1-67

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

commentaryMatthew Henry on Ezra 2:1-35An account was kept of the families that came up out of captivity. See how sin lowers a nation, which righteousness would exalt!Matthew Henry commentaryThe Return of the Captives. (b. c. 536.)THE RETURN OF THE CAPTIVES. (B. C. 536.) We may observe here, 1. That an account was kept in writing of the families that came up out of captivity, and the numbers of each family. This was done for their honour, as part…Matthew Henry commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ezra 2:1-70Men forsaking the worldly life. We regard the people returning from Babylon as typical of men going out of the worldly life into the life and work of the kingdom of God. Observe— I. THAT MEN FORSAKE THE WORLDLY LIFE FRO…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ezra 2:1-67Spiritual significances. What signifies to us, it may be asked, the exact number of the children of Parosh and Shephatiah (Ezra 2:3, Ezra 2:4)? What does it signify to us that the heads of the returning families bore su…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ezra 2:1These are the children of the province. i.e. of Judaea, which was a province of Persia, distinguished here from Babylon, which was one of the capitals—a mode of speech indicating the foreign standpoint of Ezra. Unto Jer…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ezra 2:1-67The muster-roll. The last chapter gave us a catalogue of the sacred vessels returned. In that portion of the present chapter which concludes with the above verses we have a similar catalogue of the sacred people returne…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ezra 2:2Zerubbabel, Jesbua, etc. In the corresponding verse of Nehemiah (Nehemiah 7:7) there are twelve names, one of which (it is probable) has accidentally fallen out here. The twelve are reasonably regarded as either the act…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Ezra 2:20The children of Gibbar. For "Gibbar" we should probably read "Gibeon," which occurs in the corresponding passage of Nehemiah (Nehemiah 7:25). The writer at this point passes from persons to places, making the latter por…Joseph S. Exell and contributors