Bible Commentary

Job 9:1-35

The Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-35

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Job, in answer to Bildad, admits the truth of his arguments, but declines to attempt the justification which can alone entitle him to accept the favourable side of Bildad's alternative. Man cannot absolutely justify himself before God. It is in vain to attempt to do so. The contest is too unequal. On the one side perfect wisdom and absolute strength (verse 4); on the other, weakness, imperfection, ignorance. guilt (verses 17-20). And no "daysman," or umpire, between them; no third party to hold the balance even, and preside authoritatively over the controversy, and see that justice is done (verses 33-35). Were it otherwise, Job would not shrink from the controversy; but he thinks it ill arguing with omnipotent power. What he seems to lack is the absolute conviction expressed by Abraham in the emphatic words'" Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?" ().

And Job answered and said, I know it is so of a truth. "I freely admit," is; "all that has been said." God would not cast away a perfectly righteous man (); and, of course, he punishes evil-doers. But, applied practically, what is the result? How should man be just with God? or, before God? Apart from any knowledge of the doctrine of original or inherited sin, each man feels, deep in his heart, that he is sinful—"a chief of sinners." Bradford looks upon the murderer as he mounts the scaffold, and says, "But for the grace of God, there goes John Bradford!" Job has a similar conviction, that in the sight of God, righteousness, such as it is, shrinks away into insignificance, and is as nothing, cannot anyhow be relied upon. Such must be the attitude before God of every human soul that is not puffed up with pride or utterly insensate and sunk in apathy.

Recommended reading

More for Job 9:1-35

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Job 9:1-13Job 9:1-13 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryIn this answer Job declared that he did not doubt the justice of God, when he denied himself to be a hypocrite; for how should man be just with God? Before him he pleaded guilty of sins more than could be counted; and i…Job's Reply to Bildad. (b. c. 1520.)Job 9:1-13 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleJOB'S REPLY TO BILDAD. (B. C. 1520.) Bildad began with a rebuke to Job for talking so much, Job 8:2. Job makes no answer to that, though it would have been easy enough to retort it upon himself; but in what he next lays…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-35Job 9:1-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-4Job 9:1-4 · The Pulpit CommentaryJob to Bildad: 1. Bildad's theology refuted. I. AN IRONICAL CONCESSION. "I know that it is so of a truth." The doctrine propounded by Bildad (Job 8:3), that in God's dealings with mankind such a thing as either a perver…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-4Job 9:1-4 · The Pulpit CommentaryA gospel outline. I. A SUBLIME TRUTH. Them is no unrighteousness with God (Job 9:1), in either: 1. Permitting sin. (Psalms 92:5.) 2. Afflicting man. (Deuteronomy 8:5.) 3. Saving the penitent. (Romans 3:26; 1 John 1:9.)…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-4Job 9:1-4 · The Pulpit CommentaryMan unable to answer to God. Job resumes. He knows, as truly as does Bildad, that God doth not pervert justice. His work is always right, while man is erring, vain, and sinful. How shall the creature "answer" to the Cre…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Job 9:1-13In this answer Job declared that he did not doubt the justice of God, when he denied himself to be a hypocrite; for how should man be just with God? Before him he pleaded guilty of sins more than could be counted; and i…Matthew HenrycommentaryJob's Reply to Bildad. (b. c. 1520.)JOB'S REPLY TO BILDAD. (B. C. 1520.) Bildad began with a rebuke to Job for talking so much, Job 8:2. Job makes no answer to that, though it would have been easy enough to retort it upon himself; but in what he next lays…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-4Job to Bildad: 1. Bildad's theology refuted. I. AN IRONICAL CONCESSION. "I know that it is so of a truth." The doctrine propounded by Bildad (Job 8:3), that in God's dealings with mankind such a thing as either a perver…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-4Man unable to answer to God. Job resumes. He knows, as truly as does Bildad, that God doth not pervert justice. His work is always right, while man is erring, vain, and sinful. How shall the creature "answer" to the Cre…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-35EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:1-4A gospel outline. I. A SUBLIME TRUTH. Them is no unrighteousness with God (Job 9:1), in either: 1. Permitting sin. (Psalms 92:5.) 2. Afflicting man. (Deuteronomy 8:5.) 3. Saving the penitent. (Romans 3:26; 1 John 1:9.)…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:2-20God viewed as absolute and arbitrary Power. I. THE HELPLESSNESS OF MAN IN PRESENCE OF HIS OMNIPOTENCE. (Job 9:1-3.) What avails right on one's side against him who has all heaven's artillery at his command? "It is idle…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 9:2The problem of justification. It is very doubtful how far Job conceived of this great problem as it has presented itself to us since the time of St. Paul. The whole question was confused to his apprehension by the inexp…Joseph S. Exell and contributors