Bible Commentary

Isaiah 21:9

The Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:9

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

The work of the iconoclast.

"Fallen, fallen is Babylon, and all the images of its gods he hath broken unto the ground." Recent researches have disclosed the fact that there were three sieges of Babylon during the time of Isaiah—in B.C. 709 by Sargon, and in 703 and 691 by Sennacherib. Mr. George Smith, writing of the last of these three sieges, says, "Babylon was now wholly given up to an infuriated soldiery; its walls were thrown down, its temples demolished, its people given up to violence and slavery, the temples rifled, and the images of the gods brought out and broken in pieces." Herodotus is our authority for the supposed aversion of the Medes and Persians to all images. "They not only thought it unlawful to use images, but imputed folly to those who did so." But modern researches do not confirm the statement of Herodotus, and we need see in the destruction of the Babylonian idols no more than the signs of a humiliating and overwhelming conquest. Cyrus has been hitherto regarded as a Persian and monotheist; it is now argued that he was an Elamite and a polytheist. Illustrating the subject, we note—

I. SOME MEN'S LIFE-WORK IS BUILDING UP. They make businesses; they found families; they start theories; they commence organizations; they build churches; they initiate societies. Such men are full of schemes. Moses founds a nation. David organizes a kingdom. Paul establishes a Christian society in the Gentile world. Wesley begins a sect.

II. SOME MEN'S LIFE-WORK IS KEEPING UP. They cannot begin. They are not fertile in resources. Initial difficulties crush them. But quiet perseverance, good faithful work, enables them well to sustain what others have begun.

III. SOME MEN'S LIFE-WORK IS BREAKING DOWN. As was Carlyle's. He broke down society shams, and conceits and hypocrisies of modern thought. So Mahomet broke down corrupt Christianity. The skeptic is an iconoclast; but he breaks down for the pleasure of breaking down. The critic is an iconoclast; but he only attacks the evil. The reformer must often be an iconoclast; but he breaks down only that he may rebuild. Sometimes things reach such a pass that they cannot be reformed, and then "destruction cometh from the Lord," whatever agents he may use; as in the old world, Sodom, captivity of Israel, destruction of Babylon, etc.—R.T.

Recommended reading

More for Isaiah 21:9

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Isaiah 21:1-10Isaiah 21:1-10 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryBabylon was a flat country, abundantly watered. The destruction of Babylon, so often prophesied of by Isaiah, was typical of the destruction of the great foe of the New Testament church, foretold in the Revelation. To t…The Doom of Babylon. (b. c. 714.)Isaiah 21:1-10 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE DOOM OF BABYLON. (B. C. 714.) We had one burden of Babylon before (Isaiah 13:1-22); here we have another prediction of its fall. God saw fit thus to possess his people with the belief of this event by line upon line…The Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:1-9Isaiah 21:1-9 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe effect of God's judgments on the good and on the guilty. We gather, preliminarily: 1. That God uses not only elemental forces but human agents for the accomplishment of his righteous purposes. The winds and the wave…The Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:1-17Isaiah 21:1-17 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:1-10Isaiah 21:1-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryTHE BURDEN OF THE DESERT OF THE SEA. This is a short and somewhat vague, but highly poetic, "burden of Babylon" It is probably an earlier prophecy than Isaiah 13:1-22. and 14; and perhaps the first revelation made to Is…The Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:1-10Isaiah 21:1-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryFall of Babylon. It is thought, by some recent commentators, that the description refers to the siege of Babylon in B.C. 710 by Sargon the Assyrian. The King of Babylon at that time was Merodach-Baladan, who sent letter…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Isaiah 21:1-10Babylon was a flat country, abundantly watered. The destruction of Babylon, so often prophesied of by Isaiah, was typical of the destruction of the great foe of the New Testament church, foretold in the Revelation. To t…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Doom of Babylon. (b. c. 714.)THE DOOM OF BABYLON. (B. C. 714.) We had one burden of Babylon before (Isaiah 13:1-22); here we have another prediction of its fall. God saw fit thus to possess his people with the belief of this event by line upon line…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:1-9The effect of God's judgments on the good and on the guilty. We gather, preliminarily: 1. That God uses not only elemental forces but human agents for the accomplishment of his righteous purposes. The winds and the wave…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:1-10Fall of Babylon. It is thought, by some recent commentators, that the description refers to the siege of Babylon in B.C. 710 by Sargon the Assyrian. The King of Babylon at that time was Merodach-Baladan, who sent letter…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:1-10THE BURDEN OF THE DESERT OF THE SEA. This is a short and somewhat vague, but highly poetic, "burden of Babylon" It is probably an earlier prophecy than Isaiah 13:1-22. and 14; and perhaps the first revelation made to Is…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:1-17EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Isaiah 21:9And, behold, here cometh, etc. Our translators make the words those of the watchman. But they are better taken as the prophet's statement of a fact, "And behold, just then there cometh a troop of men, riding two and two…Joseph S. Exell and contributors