Bible Commentary

Jeremiah 2:18

The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:18

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

What hast thou to do in the way of Egypt? rather, with the way to Egypt. Isaiah (; ) and Hosea (, ) had already inveighed against an Egyptian alliance. The name given by Manasseh to his sen and successor (Amen) suggests that at one period in his reign an Egyptian policy was in the ascendant, which coincides with the tradition preserved in , of an Assyrian captivity of Manasseh.

Jehoiakim at a later period was a vassal of Egypt (, ). To drink the waters; taking up the idea of the second clause of verse 13. Sihor, or Shihor, occurs again in , as a name of the Nile.

It properly means, not so much "the black" as "the dark grey" (connected with shakhar, the morning grey), from the color of the water. Rosenmüller's contrast between the muddy waters of foreign streams and the "fountain of living waters" is uncalled for; besides, the Nile water has always been held in high esteem.

The Septuagint has γηών, i.e. Gihon, also a name of-the Nile according to Ecclesiasticus 24:27. The way of—rather, to—Assyria. It is true that Assyria was, to say the least, powerless to interfere for good or for evil, when these words were written.

But in verse 5 the prophet has already warned us that his complaints are partly retrospective. It would seem that the Assyrian party from time to time gained the upper hand over the Egyptian in the councils of the State.

Or perhaps the prophet may refer to the Quixotic fidelity to Assyria of Josiah (see below on verse 36). The river; i.e. the Euphrates, "the great river" (). Babylonia it should be remembered, was in nominal subjection to Assyria; the Euphrates was the boundary between Syria and Palestine on the one hand, and Assyria—here the Assyrio-Babylonian region—on the other.

Recommended reading

More for Jeremiah 2:18

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:1-37Jeremiah 2:1-37 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION The second chapter forms the introduction of a group of discourses (Jeremiah 2-6), which should be read together. It is called By Ewald (and the position of the prophecy favors this view) the first oracle whi…Matthew Henry on Jeremiah 2:14-19Jeremiah 2:14-19 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryIs Israel a servant? No, they are the seed of Abraham. We may apply this spiritually: Is the soul of man a slave? No, it is not; but has sold its own liberty, and enslaved itself to divers lusts and passions. The Assyri…Expostulations with Israel. (b. c. 629.)Jeremiah 2:14-19 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleEXPOSTULATIONS WITH ISRAEL. (B. C. 629.) The prophet, further to evince the folly of their forsaking God, shows them what mischiefs they had already brought upon themselves by so doing; it had already cost them dear, fo…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:14-19Jeremiah 2:14-19 · The Pulpit CommentaryIsrael's punishment and its cause.The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:14-19Jeremiah 2:14-19 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe Divine ideal, how lost and regained. The prophet has in his mind what was God's original thought for Israel, the Divine ideal concerning him; and along with that the mournful and utter contrast of his actual conditi…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:18Jeremiah 2:18 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe unreasonableness of appealing to worldly assistance in spiritual enterprises. This was the tendency of Israel when her faith grew weak. It is shown even now by those who trust to the arm of flesh, and who seek world…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:1-37EXPOSITION The second chapter forms the introduction of a group of discourses (Jeremiah 2-6), which should be read together. It is called By Ewald (and the position of the prophecy favors this view) the first oracle whi…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Jeremiah 2:14-19Is Israel a servant? No, they are the seed of Abraham. We may apply this spiritually: Is the soul of man a slave? No, it is not; but has sold its own liberty, and enslaved itself to divers lusts and passions. The Assyri…Matthew HenrycommentaryExpostulations with Israel. (b. c. 629.)EXPOSTULATIONS WITH ISRAEL. (B. C. 629.) The prophet, further to evince the folly of their forsaking God, shows them what mischiefs they had already brought upon themselves by so doing; it had already cost them dear, fo…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:14-19The Divine ideal, how lost and regained. The prophet has in his mind what was God's original thought for Israel, the Divine ideal concerning him; and along with that the mournful and utter contrast of his actual conditi…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:14-19Israel's punishment and its cause.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 2:18The unreasonableness of appealing to worldly assistance in spiritual enterprises. This was the tendency of Israel when her faith grew weak. It is shown even now by those who trust to the arm of flesh, and who seek world…Joseph S. Exell and contributors