Bible Commentary

Jeremiah 22:18

The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:18

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Exceptional facts in the law of transmission of character.

"Concerning Jehoiakim the son of Josiah King of Judah." The law is that like begets like. It is so physically and mentally to large extent, and morally and spiritually as well. Generally, blessed be God, the children of his servants become his servants too. And, on the other hand, the habit of sin in the parent is reproduced in the child, so that we have criminal classes, hereditary drunkards, profligates, and much else of a similar sad sort. But the law has frequent exceptions on both sides. The two names in this verse are both of them instances of such exception. Now, how are we to account for them? We have frequent instances in the Old Testament. The sons of "Aaron the saint of the Lord;" of Eli, the devout high priest; of Samuel, the upright judge. What a set David's children were! And here we have Josiah the good, father of the infamous Jehoiakim. But we have nothing of this in the New Testament. It does not seem to be recognized there that the children of the godly can be otherwise than godly themselves. Even when one of the parents was an unbeliever, a heathen, the faith of the other was held to have such virtue that of their children St. Paul says, "Now are your children holy." We have very many instances of whole households being believers, but none of the children of believers being other than what their parents were. Would to God it were always so now! And, on the other hand, we have, as in the cases of the pious Hezekiah, son of the wicked Ahaz, and Josiah, son of Amen, who "sinned more and more," instances of ungodly parents having godly children. Now, how are these to be accounted for? Consider the sad case—

I. THAT GODLY PARENTS SHOULD HAVE UNGODLY CHILDREN. We are accustomed to assent to the possibility and frequency of this as an unquestionable truth. But is it so? We would ask two questions with a view to a better understanding of the matter.

1. Is it meant that godly parents who have been both able and anxious to train their children for God may yet have ungodly children?

2. But we ask, also—What is meant by ungodly? Do you mean those who for a while go astray, but afterwards come back? Of course, if the sin be like Manasseh's, very flagrant and long-continued, then, even though there may be the after coming back, as there was in his case, it must be allowed that such are ungodly. But that stern word should generally be reserved for a life wholly without God, and not be cast carelessly on those who, like so many of God's saints have done, may fall yet rise again; still less on children because of their natural thoughtlessness and incapacity of thinking seriously for a long time about anything. God forbid they should I But if the word "ungodly" Be confined, as it should be, to those whose lives are wholly or for the most part without God, then we affirm that such children do not spring from parents both able and really anxious to train them for God. To affirm that they are would be to contradict:

II. THAT UNGODLY PARENTS SHOULD HAVE GODLY CHILDREN. We have referred above to such cases. And they frequently occur. The chaff nourishes the wheat in its bosom. The ungodly home nurtures godly children. How is this?

1. Sometimes it is because ungodly parents are more careful than even others about the companionships of their children. They try to gain a good for their children which they know they have not for themselves. Many a bad parent wishes his child to be good.

2. Sometimes the children, seeing how wretched sin makes their home, are led to seek "a more excellent way' for themselves. The ways of godliness seem like paradise to the victim of the ungodliness of many a home. How Sunday school children—many of them from terrible homes—love their school!

3. God willing to show them that there is nothing too hard for the Lord. Can a man bring forth a clean thing out of an unclean? Certainly not. But God can, and in these instances does. And the reasons for such gracious action may be:

Hence he snatches these, trophies as it were, from the very gates of hell; plucks them as brands from the burning.

4. Conclusion. Let us give God thanks that he does this. That Amens have Josiahs for children; Ahaz, Hezekiah; Henry VIII; Edward VI. That from such a court as that of the previous reigns our own beloved queen should have come. God be praised for this and every such instance!—C.

Recommended reading

More for Jeremiah 22:18

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:1-30Jeremiah 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION Jeremiah 22:1-30 and Jeremiah 23:1-40, are connected together by similarity of subject. The temporal and spiritual leaders of the people, who are mainly responsible for the national catastrophe, receive their…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:1-23Jeremiah 22:1-23 · The Pulpit CommentaryTruth-speaking under difficulties. The prophet is commanded to go down to the king's palace and deliver his prophecies in the royal audience. His mission did not admit of time-serving or evasive utterance. Like that pro…Matthew Henry on Jeremiah 22:10-19Jeremiah 22:10-19 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryHere is a sentence of death upon two kings, the wicked sons of a very pious father. Josiah was prevented from seeing the evil to come in this world, and removed to see the good to come in the other world; therefore, wee…The Doom of Shallum and Jehoiakim. (b. c. 590.)Jeremiah 22:10-19 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE DOOM OF SHALLUM AND JEHOIAKIM. (B. C. 590.) Kings, though they are gods to us, are men to God, and shall die like men; so it appears in these verses, where we have a sentence of death passed upon two kings who reign…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:13-19Jeremiah 22:13-19 · The Pulpit CommentarySon and father: a sad contrast. A wicked son, Jeheiakim is not only reproached with his wickedness, but reminded of the very different conduct of his honored father. The contrast is very striking, varied, and instructiv…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:13-19Jeremiah 22:13-19 · The Pulpit CommentaryA right aim pursued by a wrong and cruel method. I. A RIGHT AIM. What this aim was is indicated in Jeremiah 22:15. Jehoiakim wanted to be a king. In one sense he was a king, without any effort of his own, for he had suc…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:1-23Truth-speaking under difficulties. The prophet is commanded to go down to the king's palace and deliver his prophecies in the royal audience. His mission did not admit of time-serving or evasive utterance. Like that pro…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:1-30EXPOSITION Jeremiah 22:1-30 and Jeremiah 23:1-40, are connected together by similarity of subject. The temporal and spiritual leaders of the people, who are mainly responsible for the national catastrophe, receive their…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Jeremiah 22:10-19Here is a sentence of death upon two kings, the wicked sons of a very pious father. Josiah was prevented from seeing the evil to come in this world, and removed to see the good to come in the other world; therefore, wee…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Doom of Shallum and Jehoiakim. (b. c. 590.)THE DOOM OF SHALLUM AND JEHOIAKIM. (B. C. 590.) Kings, though they are gods to us, are men to God, and shall die like men; so it appears in these verses, where we have a sentence of death passed upon two kings who reign…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:13-19A right aim pursued by a wrong and cruel method. I. A RIGHT AIM. What this aim was is indicated in Jeremiah 22:15. Jehoiakim wanted to be a king. In one sense he was a king, without any effort of his own, for he had suc…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:13-19Son and father: a sad contrast. A wicked son, Jeheiakim is not only reproached with his wickedness, but reminded of the very different conduct of his honored father. The contrast is very striking, varied, and instructiv…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 22:18Josiah had been bitterly missed and universally lamented (2 Chronicles 35:25); and so, only perhaps with less heartiness in most cases, Jehoiakim's other predecessors (Jeremiah 34:5). The Babylonian kings, too, received…Joseph S. Exell and contributors