Bible Commentary

Jeremiah 24:1-10

The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Punished for salvation; left alone for destruction.

A general principle of God's moral government. The flower of Judah, about to be deported to Babylon, are followed by the prophet with wistful gaze. They are the seed of the true Israel; whereas those who are allowed to remain quietly at home are to be of no account in God's purpose.

I. HOW DIFFERENT OFTEN ARE THE EXTERNAL FROM THE SPIRITUAL PROSPECTS OF MEN! Jeconiah and his companions might have been pitied by their friends left behind. The outward position of any one is no index of his relations with God.

II. PRESENT TRIAL MAY BE A PROOF OF DIVINE LOVE, AND PRESENT IMMUNITY FROM MISFORTUNE IS NOT ALWAYS TO BE TAKEN AS AN EVIDENCE OF DIVINE FAVOR. "Whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth." Punishment was needed to atone for the past and purify for the future. The exile in Babylon, with its deprivation of political and religious privilege, was a new point of view for the captives. It is a familiar experience to hear men who have done well in the world, or who have had a comparatively smooth life, say, "God has blessed us." This statement is often open to question. God may simply let alone those whom he has given up. The lethargy induced in many by good fortune is to be guarded against. Count them happy that "endure, as seeing him who is invisible." Inward depravity will soon work the destruction of those in whom it remains.

III. THE GLORY OF THE DIVINE IN MAN IS EVOLVED FROM THE HUMILIATION OF THE HUMAN. A mere remnant. How few of those who went forth would return! Children's children might be blessed, but not they themselves. And even then it would require not only reorganization, but rebirth in spirituality. It is ever so. A profound and radical change is needed ere any one can become a member of the true eternal Israel. Israel after the flesh is sentenced to death, that Israel after the Spirit may live forever.—M.

Recommended reading

More for Jeremiah 24:1-10

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Jeremiah 24:1-10Jeremiah 24:1-10 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe prophet saw two baskets of figs set before the temple, as offerings of first-fruits. The figs in one basket were very good, those in the other basket very bad. What creature viler than a wicked man? and what more va…Vision of the Good and Bad Figs; Promises and Threatenings. (b. c. 599.)Jeremiah 24:1-10 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleVISION OF THE GOOD AND BAD FIGS; PROMISES AND THREATENINGS. (B. C. 599.) This short chapter helps us to put a very comfortable construction upon a great many long ones, by showing us that the same providence which to so…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10Jeremiah 24:1-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION Again Jeremiah's ungrateful task is to take up an attitude of direct opposition to the king (comp. Jeremiah 22:13-30), though, indeed, Zedekiah personally is so weak and dependent on others that he neither de…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1Jeremiah 24:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryTwo baskets of figs were set before, etc. (comp. Amos 8:1-3). The description is apparently based on the law of firstfruits (comp. Deuteronomy 26:2), where the "basket" is mentioned, though not the word here used. The b…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10Jeremiah 24:1-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryTwo baskets of figs. I. MORALLY MEN ARE DIVISIBLE INTO TWO DISTINCT CLASSES. The two baskets of figs represent two classes of Jews: the basket of good figs, Jeconiah and his followers; the basket of bad figs, Zedekiah a…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10Jeremiah 24:1-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe two baskets of figs; or, predetermining influences. These are not to be understood of the opposite development of character in two sets of persons in slightly differing circumstances, but rather of the primary influ…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Jeremiah 24:1-10The prophet saw two baskets of figs set before the temple, as offerings of first-fruits. The figs in one basket were very good, those in the other basket very bad. What creature viler than a wicked man? and what more va…Matthew HenrycommentaryVision of the Good and Bad Figs; Promises and Threatenings. (b. c. 599.)VISION OF THE GOOD AND BAD FIGS; PROMISES AND THREATENINGS. (B. C. 599.) This short chapter helps us to put a very comfortable construction upon a great many long ones, by showing us that the same providence which to so…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1Two baskets of figs were set before, etc. (comp. Amos 8:1-3). The description is apparently based on the law of firstfruits (comp. Deuteronomy 26:2), where the "basket" is mentioned, though not the word here used. The b…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10The good and bad figs. I. CONSIDER THE FIGS GENERALLY. We cannot, of course, say why figs should be chosen rather than another fruit, though the choice can hardly be a mere accident. Some reason probably appeared to the…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10EXPOSITION Again Jeremiah's ungrateful task is to take up an attitude of direct opposition to the king (comp. Jeremiah 22:13-30), though, indeed, Zedekiah personally is so weak and dependent on others that he neither de…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10Two baskets of figs. I. MORALLY MEN ARE DIVISIBLE INTO TWO DISTINCT CLASSES. The two baskets of figs represent two classes of Jews: the basket of good figs, Jeconiah and his followers; the basket of bad figs, Zedekiah a…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10The two baskets of figs; or, predetermining influences. These are not to be understood of the opposite development of character in two sets of persons in slightly differing circumstances, but rather of the primary influ…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 24:1-10Calamity with God and without him. I. To THE CHILD OF GRACE. 1. It is a chastening. 2. A restoration. II. To THE UNGODLY. 1. The influence depreciating character. 2. A source of restlessness and fresh transgression. 3.…Joseph S. Exell and contributors