Bible Commentary

Jeremiah 39:3

The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 39:3

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

And all the princes, etc.; rather, That all the princes, etc. (see on ). The fact mentioned in this verse is not recorded in .; ch. 52; and its preciseness is a considerable pledge of its accuracy.

The princes are four in number, and two of them have official titles attached. Nergal-sharezer is the Hebraized form of Nirgal-sarra-ucur, i.e. "Nirgal (or Nergal), protect (or perhaps, has created) the king"—the name, as often, is a prayer.

Samgar-nebo is probably a modification of Sumgir-nabu, "Be gracious, Nebo;" but it has not yet been found in the inscriptions. Sarsechim has the appearance of being corrupt; the first part, however, may, perhaps, be the Babylonian for "king" ("prince" in Hebrew).

Rab-saris has a meaning in Hebrew—"chief of the eunuchs;" but the analogies of "Rab-mag" and "Rab-shakeh" suggest that it is merely the Hebraized form of some Assyrian title. In any case, it would be better to render "the Rab-saris," and to attach it closely to the preceding name, Sarsechim being himself the official called Rab-saris (see, however, ).

Rab-mag. This was "one of the highest titles in the state" (G. Smith). The etymology of the latter half of the phrase is uncertain; for the connection of "mag" with "Magi" is a mistake which has been exposed by Dr.

Schrader, in his work, 'Die Keilinschriften und das Alte Testament' (of which a translation is announced). The native form of the name may be rubu emga (Schrader) or rubu makhe (Friedr. Delitzsch), and the whole title will mean "high priest" or "chief of the sorcerers".

"The Rab-mag" would be more accurate, and the title ought to be attached to the preceding name, Nergal-sharezer. As a matter of fact, a Nirgal-sarra-ucur, who held the office of rubu emga, is mentioned in the cuneiform inscriptions, and we may plausibly conjecture that he is the person here mentioned among the "princes."

He was afterwards raised to the throne by the conspirators who murdered Evil-merodach, the son of Nebuchadnezzar (he is better known as Neriglissar). It is singular that two Nergal-sharezers should be here mentioned; possibly the first mention is due to a mistake.

The names are hardly recognizable in the Septuagint. The "princes" took up their station in the middle gate. The "breach" spoken of in enabled the Babylonians to occupy the whole of the lower city to the northeast of Zion.

The "middle gate" probably separated these two parts of Jerusalem, and those who were posted there commanded the temple and the citadel.

Recommended reading

More for Jeremiah 39:3

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Jeremiah 39:1-10Jeremiah 39:1-10 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryJerusalem was so strong, that the inhabitants believed the enemy could never enter it. But sin provoked God to withdraw his protection, and then it was as weak as other cities. Zedekiah had his eyes put out; so he was c…Jerusalem Taken. (b. c. 588.)Jeremiah 39:1-10 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleJERUSALEM TAKEN. (B. C. 588.) We were told, in the close of the foregoing chapter, that Jeremiah abode patiently in the court of the prison, until the day that Jerusalem was taken. He gave the princes no further disturb…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 39:1-18Jeremiah 39:1-18 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION This chapter is very confused as it stands. To restore order it is absolutely necessary to suppose that some passages (viz. Jeremiah 39:1, Jeremiah 39:2, and Jeremiah 39:4-13) have been inserted by after thou…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 39:1-8Jeremiah 39:1-8 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe retribution of God. What an accumulation of woe do the eight verses with which this chapter opens present! Let thought dwell on the several statements made here, and let imagination seek to realize what they must ha…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 39:1-8Jeremiah 39:1-8 · The Pulpit CommentarySiege and savagery. I. THE MANNER IN WHICH THE CAPTURE OF JERUSALEM IS RELATED. Just enough is told to certify to us the complete and exact fulfilment of prophecy. There is a long siege, a great destruction, and great h…