The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:11

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Zedekiah's fate.

Here is a triple bondage—the bondage of blindness, fetters, and imprisonment. Truly a dreadful doom! Look—

I. AT THE CAUSE OF IT.

1. The cause so far as it lies in his own conduct. There was no need for him to accept a throne as viceroy for Babylon, but, having done so, he had entered into an implied covenant. No wonder that the King of Babylon took special care to stamp such conduct in a peculiar way.

2. The cause so far as it lies in the notions of the time. Zedekiah was treated, not only vindictively, but savagely. The meaning must have been to humiliate him, to make the iron enter into his very soul. What a difference Christianity has made in the treatment of conquered foes! The change has Come very slowly, but it is real and stable. One cannot imagine the time returning when a captured enemy would be deprived of his eyesight.

II. AT A CONTRAST IMMEDIATELY SUGGESTED. One cannot but think of Samson, whose external condition was exactly that of Zedekiah, blinded, fettered, and imprisoned. Reduced to this state the Philistines reckoned he was impotent. Zedekiah really was impotent; he seems to have gone on to the day of his death in monotonous submission to what he felt necessity. But it was only necessity because he made it so. The worst limitations our fellow men can put on us may become in certain conditions like an easily snapped thread. Zedekiah might have risen above all these insults and pains. Perhaps he did rise. It is well for us to recollect how God has placed the essential liberty of every individual in his own hands.—Y.

Jeremiah 52:12, Jeremiah 52:13

A great burning.

I. THE BURNING IN GENERAL. The sum of the details amounts to a statement that the city was reduced to ashes. For this not Babylon is to be blamed, but Zedekiah and his predecessors, together with their advisers. Babylon was only acting according to the fashion of the times. The hand of Jehovah was withdrawn, the hand that might have averted the torch; and it was withdrawn because the destruction of Jerusalem had become a better thing for the world than its preservation. Still, it is not to be said in the fullest sense of the word that Jehovah destroyed Jerusalem say as he destroyed Babylon. In the course of a few generations Jerusalem rose from its ashes, temple included. The mere destruction of buildings, terrible as it is at the time, may soon be got over, as witness the rebuilding of London, and Chicago. The decay of national spirit and national resources is the thing to be feared.

II. THE BURNING OF THE TEMPLE IN PARTICULAR. Babylon had no fear in destroying the house of the Lord. Doubtless it was quite a common thing in war to destroy the temples of gods, for they were looked upon merely as part of the resources of nations. We must distinguish between what is essentially sacred and what is sacred only by association and to serve a purpose. When the purpose is accomplished the sacred sinks back into the common. God dwelleth not in temples made with hands. He was none the poorer for all this burning. Babylon learned hereafter that, though his house had been burned, his power was not at all diminished. The chief value of the temple lay in this, that it had been an expression of the piety and devotion of David and Solomon. Kings and people alike had proved themselves unworthy of their great ancestors.—Y.

Jeremiah 51

Jeremiah

Lamentations Intro

Jeremiah 52 - jeremiah-52 - worlddic.com

More for Jeremiah 52:11

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Jeremiah 52:1-11Jeremiah 52:1-11 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThis fruit of sin we should pray against above any thing; Cast me not away from thy presence, Ps. 51:11. None are cast out of God's presence but those who by sin have first thrown themselves out. Zedekiah's flight was i…Jerusalem Taken by Nebuchadnezzar. (b. c. 588.)Jeremiah 52:1-11 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleJERUSALEM TAKEN BY NEBUCHADNEZZAR. (B. C. 588.) This narrative begins no higher than the beginning of the reign of Zedekiah, though there were two captivities before, one in the fourth year of Jehoiakim, the other in th…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:1-34Jeremiah 52:1-34 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION The contents of this chapter prove that it is not an independent narrative, but the concluding part of a history of the kings of Judah. It agrees almost word for word with 2Ki 24:18-25:30, from which we are j…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:4-34Jeremiah 52:4-34 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe march of doom. These verses tell of the awful progress of the judgment of God on the doomed city of Jerusalem, her king, and people. To all who imagine that God is too full of love and graciousness to sternly judge…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:8-11Jeremiah 52:8-11 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe fate of Zedekiah. I. THE CAUSES WHICH LED TO THE FATE OF ZEDEKIAH. 1. The general calamity of his nation. The king suffers with his people. Unfortunately it too often happens that an innocent people is punished for…The Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:8-11Jeremiah 52:8-11 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe irony of a name. These verses tell of King Zedekiah—of the tragedy of Zedekiah, we might say, for never was there a tragedy more terrible than that in which he bore the chief part. But think of his name—"Jehovah our…

commentaryMatthew Henry on Jeremiah 52:1-11This fruit of sin we should pray against above any thing; Cast me not away from thy presence, Ps. 51:11. None are cast out of God's presence but those who by sin have first thrown themselves out. Zedekiah's flight was i…Matthew Henry commentaryJerusalem Taken by Nebuchadnezzar. (b. c. 588.)JERUSALEM TAKEN BY NEBUCHADNEZZAR. (B. C. 588.) This narrative begins no higher than the beginning of the reign of Zedekiah, though there were two captivities before, one in the fourth year of Jehoiakim, the other in th…Matthew Henry commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:1-34EXPOSITION The contents of this chapter prove that it is not an independent narrative, but the concluding part of a history of the kings of Judah. It agrees almost word for word with 2Ki 24:18-25:30, from which we are j…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:4-34The march of doom. These verses tell of the awful progress of the judgment of God on the doomed city of Jerusalem, her king, and people. To all who imagine that God is too full of love and graciousness to sternly judge…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:8-11The fate of Zedekiah. I. THE CAUSES WHICH LED TO THE FATE OF ZEDEKIAH. 1. The general calamity of his nation. The king suffers with his people. Unfortunately it too often happens that an innocent people is punished for…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:8-11The irony of a name. These verses tell of King Zedekiah—of the tragedy of Zedekiah, we might say, for never was there a tragedy more terrible than that in which he bore the chief part. But think of his name—"Jehovah our…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Jeremiah 52:11In prison; literally, in the house of custody.Joseph S. Exell and contributors