Bible Commentary

Daniel 5:9

The Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:9

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Then was King Belshazzar greatly troubled, and his countenance was changed in him, and his lords were astonied. This verse presents signs also of being a repetition. The last clause appears to be the original form of the mysterious clause at the end of the sixth verse according to the Septuagint; the word mishtabsheen, which occurs here, seems to have been read mishtabhareen, from שַׁבְהַר (shab'har), "to be glorious," in the ittaphel; this becomes "to boast one's self," as in the Targum of , also the Peshitta of the same passage; also .

And this is the word used by Paulus Tellensis to translate καυχῶνται. The Septuagint has a verse here that has no equivalent in the Massoretic text, "Then the king called the queen about the sign, and showed her how great it was, and that no one had been able to declare to the king the interpretation of the writing."

This verse avoids the repetition we find in the Massoretic text, and explains the presence of the queen in a much more plausible way than the received text does. In the Massoretic text it is the noise and tumult that pierces the women's apartments, and brings out the queen-mother; though not impossible, this is unlikely.

The action of the king, as given in the Septuagint, is very probable. The wise men are baffled by this mysteriously appearing inscription. What is to be done? Belshazzar calls his mother, the daughter of Nebuchadnezzar, as she at least possibly was, to see if she knows anything in the past that might be a guide in such a matter.

He not only shows her the sign, the inscription, but shows how great it was, by telling of the hand that had come out of the darkness, and had written it. Theodotion and the Peshitta agree with the Massoretic text.

While the repetition is obvious, it is also true that the failure of all the wise men in Babylon to read the writing, as the Massoretic text has it, would increase the trouble of the king, and this trouble would naturally spread to the courtiers.

Recommended reading

More for Daniel 5:9

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Daniel 5:1-9Daniel 5:1-9 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryBelshazzar bade defiance to the judgments of God. Most historians consider that Cyrus then besieged Babylon. Security and sensuality are sad proofs of approaching ruin. That mirth is sinful indeed, which profanes sacred…Belshazzar's Feast; The Hand-writing on the Wall. (b. c. 538.)Daniel 5:1-9 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleBELSHAZZAR'S FEAST; THE HAND-WRITING ON THE WALL. (B. C. 538.) We have here Belshazzar the king very gay, but all of a sudden very gloomy, and in straits in the fulness of his sufficiency. See how he affronts God, and G…The Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:1-31Daniel 5:1-31 · The Pulpit CommentaryBELSHAZZAR'S FEAST. In regard to this chapter the peculiar state of the Septuagint text has to be noted. At the beginning of the chapter there are three verses which seem to be either variant versions of the Septuagint…The Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:1-31Daniel 5:1-31 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:1-9Daniel 5:1-9 · The Pulpit CommentaryBlasted merriment. All merriment is not forbidden. Banqueting is not in itself a sin. Jesus Christ himself honoured with his presence a marriage festival, and contributed, by miracle, the wine for the occasion. On the r…The Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:5-17Daniel 5:5-17 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe crisis of awaking. "Then was Daniel brought in before the king" (verse 13). In introducing the present subject the following features and incidents of the history need vivid and powerful setting: suddenness of the a…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Daniel 5:1-9Belshazzar bade defiance to the judgments of God. Most historians consider that Cyrus then besieged Babylon. Security and sensuality are sad proofs of approaching ruin. That mirth is sinful indeed, which profanes sacred…Matthew HenrycommentaryBelshazzar's Feast; The Hand-writing on the Wall. (b. c. 538.)BELSHAZZAR'S FEAST; THE HAND-WRITING ON THE WALL. (B. C. 538.) We have here Belshazzar the king very gay, but all of a sudden very gloomy, and in straits in the fulness of his sufficiency. See how he affronts God, and G…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:1-31BELSHAZZAR'S FEAST. In regard to this chapter the peculiar state of the Septuagint text has to be noted. At the beginning of the chapter there are three verses which seem to be either variant versions of the Septuagint…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:1-9Blasted merriment. All merriment is not forbidden. Banqueting is not in itself a sin. Jesus Christ himself honoured with his presence a marriage festival, and contributed, by miracle, the wine for the occasion. On the r…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:1-31EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 5:5-17The crisis of awaking. "Then was Daniel brought in before the king" (verse 13). In introducing the present subject the following features and incidents of the history need vivid and powerful setting: suddenness of the a…Joseph S. Exell and contributors