Bible Commentary

Daniel 2:31-45

Matthew Henry on Daniel 2:31-45

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

This image represented the kingdoms of the earth, that should successively rule the nations, and influence the affairs of the Jewish church. 1. The head of gold signified the Chaldean empire, then in being.

2. The breast and arms of silver signified the empire of the Medes and Persians. 3. The belly and thighs of brass signified the Grecian empire, founded by Alexander. 4. The legs and feet of iron signified the Roman empire.

The Roman empire branched into ten kingdoms, as the toes of these feet. Some were weak as clay, others strong as iron. Endeavours have often been used to unite them, for strengthening the empire, but in vain.

The stone cut out without hands, represented the kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ, which should be set up in the kingdoms of the world, upon the ruins of Satan's kingdom in them. This was the Stone which the builders refused, because it was not cut out by their hands, but it is become the head stone of the corner.

Of the increase of Christ's government and peace there shall be no end. The Lord shall reign, not only to the end of time, but when time and days shall be no more. As far as events have gone, the fulfilling this prophetic vision has been most exact and undeniable; future ages shall witness this Stone destroying the image, and filling the whole earth.

Recommended reading

More for Daniel 2:31-45

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 2:1-49EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 2:1-49DANIEL FIRST BECOMES DISTINGUISHED.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryNebuchadnezzar's Dream Interpreted. (b. c. 603.)NEBUCHADNEZZAR'S DREAM INTERPRETED. (B. C. 603.) Daniel here gives full satisfaction to Nebuchadnezzar concerning his dream and the interpretation of it. That great prince had been kind to this poor prophet in his maint…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 2:31-45The image and the stone. The king's dream as interpreted by Daniel shadows forth the history of successive monarchies, and the final overthrow of them by a greater unearthly kingdom. On the face of it it teaches the bro…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 2:31Thou, O king, sawest, and behold a great image. This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before thee; and the form thereof was terrible. The Greek versions do not require notice, as they do not imply any…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 2:34Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces. Practically, the versions are at one with the Massoretic text in regard…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 2:35Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing-floors. The versions arc closer to the Massoretic than our Authorized Versio…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Daniel 2:36This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king. The various versions agree closely with the Massoretic text. It is scarcely a variation when the Septuagint has ἐπὶ, "to," instead of ἐν…Joseph S. Exell and contributors