Bible Commentary

Matthew 18:21

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Peter was greatly struck with what Christ had just said about reconciliation of enemies; and he wanted to know what limits were to be imposed on his generosity, especially, it might be, if the offender made no reparation for his offence, and acknowledged not his wrong doing.

My brother. As , fellow disciple, neighbour. Till seven times? Peter doubtless thought that he was unusually liberal and generous in proposing such a measure of forgiveness. Seven is the number of completeness and plurality, and our Lord had used it in giving his sentence about forgiveness: "If he trespass against thee seven times in a day, and seven times in a day turn to thee again," etc.

(). Some rabbis had fixed this limit from an erroneous interpretation of ; . "For three transgressions, and for four," etc.; but the usual precept enjoined forgiveness of three offences only, drawing the line here, and having no pity for a fourth offence.

Ben-Sira bids a man admonish an offending neighbour twice, but is silent as to any further forgiveness (Ecclesiasticus 19:13-17). The Jews were very fond of defining and limiting moral obligations, as if they could be accurately prescribed by number.

Christ demolishes this attempt to define by law the measure of grace.

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 18:21

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:1-35Matthew 18:1-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryDiscourse concerning the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, and the mutual duties of Christians. (Mark 9:33-50; Luke 9:46-50.)Matthew Henry on Matthew 18:21-35Matthew 18:21-35 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThough we live wholly on mercy and forgiveness, we are backward to forgive the offences of our brethren. This parable shows how much provocation God has from his family on earth, and how untoward his servants are. There…Christian Worshippers Encouraged; The Cruel CreditorMatthew 18:21-35 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleCHRISTIAN WORSHIPPERS ENCOURAGED; THE CRUEL CREDITOR. This part of the discourse concerning offences is certainly to be understood of personal wrongs, which is in our power to forgive. Now observe, I. Peter's question c…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35Matthew 18:21-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe law of forgiveness. I. THE CONVERSATION WITH ST. PETER. 1. Peter's question. The Lord had intimated the duty of gentleness in dealing with offences. Every effort was to be used to reconcile the offending brother; he…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35Matthew 18:21-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe unmerciful servant. The form of Peter's question shows that he still considered that to forgive was not the law of the kingdom, but a tentative measure which might at any moment be revoked, that underneath the forgi…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35Matthew 18:21-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe limits of mercy. Peter's question here was suggested by his Lord's doctrine concerning Christian judgment (Matthew 18:15-20). "Then came Peter," etc. The form of Peter's question may have been suggested by the custo…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:1-35Discourse concerning the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, and the mutual duties of Christians. (Mark 9:33-50; Luke 9:46-50.)Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 18:21-35Though we live wholly on mercy and forgiveness, we are backward to forgive the offences of our brethren. This parable shows how much provocation God has from his family on earth, and how untoward his servants are. There…Matthew HenrycommentaryChristian Worshippers Encouraged; The Cruel CreditorCHRISTIAN WORSHIPPERS ENCOURAGED; THE CRUEL CREDITOR. This part of the discourse concerning offences is certainly to be understood of personal wrongs, which is in our power to forgive. Now observe, I. Peter's question c…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35The pardon of injuries, and the parable of the unmerciful servant.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35The limits of mercy. Peter's question here was suggested by his Lord's doctrine concerning Christian judgment (Matthew 18:15-20). "Then came Peter," etc. The form of Peter's question may have been suggested by the custo…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35The law of forgiveness. I. THE CONVERSATION WITH ST. PETER. 1. Peter's question. The Lord had intimated the duty of gentleness in dealing with offences. Every effort was to be used to reconcile the offending brother; he…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35The unmerciful servant. The form of Peter's question shows that he still considered that to forgive was not the law of the kingdom, but a tentative measure which might at any moment be revoked, that underneath the forgi…Joseph S. Exell and contributors