Bible Commentary

Matthew 22:21

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:21

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Christ keeping to his province.

The coin produced was probably a silver denarius of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, and it bore on its face the head of the emperor, and had an inscription running round it, containing his name and titles. To understand how this question was intended to entangle Christ, we must remember that the Mosaic injunction, "Thou mayest not set a stranger over thee" (), was made by the rabbis to mean that they must not pay tribute to any foreign power. The Romans levied a poll tax on each individual, and this tax was particularly offensive to the patriotic party. If they could make Jesus take part with the zealots, they could accuse him to the Romans as a dangerous person and fomenter of rebellion. The answer of Jesus is very variously explained, and has even been taken as a watchword of particular religious schools. But the answer is really a refusal to answer; and in this its skilfulness is seen.

I. CHRIST'S REPROACH. "Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?" This must have annoyed them, and made them fear that they would do but little with him. This impressed the people, who were listening, and made them fee[sure that he was more than a match for the entanglers.

II. CHRIST'S REQUEST. "Show me a penny." As it had to be a coin that tribute to Caesar could be paid in, and not a shekel with which payments in support of God's temple were made, it had to have the head of the reigning Caesar on it. Christ evidently examined it in view of the people, who were anxiously watching; and he made his questioners say distinctly whose image was on the coin. It was not God's temple; it was Caesar.

III. CHRIST'S REPLY. "Caesar's is it? then it is nothing to me. I am the servant of God. I have nothing to say on such a matter. It is not in my province. If Caesar's head is on the coin, no doubt it belongs to him; then give it him if it is his." Jesus had no authority to urge the claims of Caesar; he came to urge the claims of God. And he meant to keep to his province. If they wanted to know anything about the Word and will of God, he was ready to explain and teach. But Caesar had better mind his own business, and he would mind his. In our time, earnest effort is being made to obliterate the distinction between the "secular" and the "sacred." The distinction is real and abiding. Our Lord set his seal upon it. They may run in harmony, but they run, and they always must run, along distinct lines.—R.T.

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 22:21

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46Matthew 22:1-46 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe Pharisees sent their disciples with the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for full subjection to the Roman emperor. Though opposed to each other, they joined against Christ. What they said of Christ was ri…The Question Respecting TributeMatthew 22:15-22 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE QUESTION RESPECTING TRIBUTE. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · The Pulpit CommentaryTribute to Caesar. It is easy to see the trap that the Pharisees induced the Herodians to set for our Lord. If he refused to sanction the paying of tribute to Caesar, he could be accused of sedition against the Roman go…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Matthew 22:15-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryQuestion of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Matthew 22:15-22 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe ethics of the tribute. The Pharisees had hitherto questioned our Lord on points of ecclesiastical ethics, and were invariably worsted. Now they face round and assail him with the weapon of political ethics. "Is it l…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:15-22The Pharisees sent their disciples with the Herodians, a party among the Jews, who were for full subjection to the Roman emperor. Though opposed to each other, they joined against Christ. What they said of Christ was ri…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Question Respecting TributeTHE QUESTION RESPECTING TRIBUTE. It was not the least grievous of the sufferings of Christ, that he endured the contradiction of sinners against himself, and had snares laid for him by those that sought how to take him…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Second attack: The question concerning the tribute to Caesar. (Mark 12:13-17; Luke 20:20-26.)Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22The ethics of the tribute. The Pharisees had hitherto questioned our Lord on points of ecclesiastical ethics, and were invariably worsted. Now they face round and assail him with the weapon of political ethics. "Is it l…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22The question of tribute. I. THE TEMPTATION. 1. The coalition. The Pharisees were greatly offended. They as well as the chief priests (Matthew 21:45) perceived that these parables were spoken of them. Their conscience sm…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-22Tribute to Caesar. It is easy to see the trap that the Pharisees induced the Herodians to set for our Lord. If he refused to sanction the paying of tribute to Caesar, he could be accused of sedition against the Roman go…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Question of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…Joseph S. Exell and contributors