Bible Commentary

Mark 12:18-23

The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-23

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

And there come unto him Sadducees, which say that there is no resurrection. Josephus states that in the time of Judas Maceabaeus there were three sects of the Jews, differing amongst themselves, namely, the Pharisees, the Sadducees, and the Essenes.

The Hebrew word Zadoc, from which the Sadducees derive their name, means "just." or" righteous." These Sadducees accepted the Pentateuch, and probably more than the Pentateuch; but they rejected any oral tradition.

They were known in the time of our Lord as denying those doctrines which connect us more immediately with another world, such as the existence of spirits and of angels, and the resurrection of the body.

They altogether denied fate, affirming that all things are in our own power. They heard Christ preach the resurrection, and by means of it persuade men to repentance and a holy life. They therefore proposed to him a question which appeared to them to be fatal to the doctrine of a future state and a resurrection.

The case supposed is that of seven brethren, who, in compliance with the Law of Moses, one after another, as each died in succession, took the same woman to wife. It is probable that such a case may actually have occurred; at any rate, it was a possible case.

And the question founded upon it by the Sadducees was this—Whose wife would she be of them in the resurrection? Here, then, they hoped to entangle him, and to show that the doctrine of the resurrection was absurd.

For if our Lord should say that in the resurrection she would be the wife of one only, the other brethren would have been excited to envy and continual strife. Nor could he have said that she would be common to the seven brothers.

Such were the absurdities which, as they intimated, would flow out of his doctrine of the resurrection, if it could be proved. But our Lord scatters to the winds all this foolish reasoning, by adding one clause omitted by them, and overlooked by men of mere earthly minds, namely, that in the world to come this widow would be the wife of none of the seven brethren.

Recommended reading

More for Mark 12:18-23

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:1-44Mark 12:1-44 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Mark 12:18-27Mark 12:18-27 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryA right knowledge of the Scripture, as the fountain whence all revealed religion now flows, and the foundation on which it is built, is the best preservative against error. Christ put aside the objection of the Sadducee…The Question of the SadduceesMark 12:18-27 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE QUESTION OF THE SADDUCEES. The Sadducees, who were the deists of that age, here attack our Lord Jesus, it should seem, not as the scribes, and Pharisees, and chief-priests, with any malicious design upon his person;…The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Mark 12:18-27 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe puzzle of the Sadducees. I. THE CASE STATED. An extreme one; and probably a locus classicus in the works of the rabbins. It was supposed to be a reductio ad absurdum of all theories of resurrection or immortality. "…The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Mark 12:18-27 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe resurrection from the dead. A new class of antagonists now assail the great "Master" with a case of casuistry, designed evidently to bring the doctrine of the resurrection into contempt. "In the resurrection whose w…The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Mark 12:18-27 · The Pulpit CommentarySadducean error. I. DIFFICULTIES OF RELIEF ARE OFTEN IDLE LUXURIES OF THE MIND. One cannot suppose that these men were really troubled by such a question as they raised. It was sheer idleness, bred of useless school lif…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:1-44EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Mark 12:18-27A right knowledge of the Scripture, as the fountain whence all revealed religion now flows, and the foundation on which it is built, is the best preservative against error. Christ put aside the objection of the Sadducee…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Question of the SadduceesTHE QUESTION OF THE SADDUCEES. The Sadducees, who were the deists of that age, here attack our Lord Jesus, it should seem, not as the scribes, and Pharisees, and chief-priests, with any malicious design upon his person;…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Sadducees confuted. Of all the subjects which awaken the speculative curiosity and inquiry of men, none approaches, in dignity and importance, the future life. The nobler spirits, in every civilized and cultured communi…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Sadducean error. I. DIFFICULTIES OF RELIEF ARE OFTEN IDLE LUXURIES OF THE MIND. One cannot suppose that these men were really troubled by such a question as they raised. It was sheer idleness, bred of useless school lif…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27The resurrection from the dead. A new class of antagonists now assail the great "Master" with a case of casuistry, designed evidently to bring the doctrine of the resurrection into contempt. "In the resurrection whose w…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Parallel passages: Matthew 22:23-33; Luke 20:27-40.— Question of the Sadducees touching the resurrection. I. IMPORTANCE OF THE QUESTION. Though the question propounded in this section was proposed for a captious purpose…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27The puzzle of the Sadducees. I. THE CASE STATED. An extreme one; and probably a locus classicus in the works of the rabbins. It was supposed to be a reductio ad absurdum of all theories of resurrection or immortality. "…Joseph S. Exell and contributors