Bible Commentary

Mark 12:26

The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:26

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

St. Mark is here careful to state that what St. Matthew describes as "the word spoken by God" was to be found in the book of Moses (), in the place concerning the Bush ( ἐπὶ τῆς βάτου), as it is correctly rendered in the Revised Version.

Our Lord might have brought yet clearer proofs out of Job, Daniel, Ezekiel, etc.; but in his wisdom he preferred to allege this out of Moses and the Pentateuch, because, whatever the views of the Sadducees may have been as to other parts of the Old Testament, these books of Moses they readily acknowledged.

I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. The force of the argument is this, that "God is not the God of the dead, but of the living." Their souls are still alive; and if these patriarchs are still alive, there will be a resurrection.

If men are to live for ever, they will, sooner or later, live again in the completeness of their being, namely, of body and soul and spirit. Our Lord would, therefore, say this: "In a few days you will put me to death; but in three days I shall rise again from the dead.

And after that, in due time I shall raise them from the dead at the last day, and bring them in triumph with me into heaven." The Sadducees and the Epicureans denied the resurrection, because they denied the immortality of the soul; for these two doctrines hang together.

For if the soul is immortal, then, since it naturally depends upon the body, it is necessary that the body should rise. Otherwise the soul would continue to exist in a dislocated state, and would only obtain a divided life and an imperfect existence.

Hence our Lord here distinctly proves the resurrection of the body from the immortality of the soul. When he speaks of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, he does not speak of their souls only, but of their whole being.

Therefore, though they are for a time dead to us, yet they live to God, and sleep, as it were, because ere long God will raise them from death, as from a sleep, to a blessed and endless life. For all, though they have passed out of our sight, still live to him.

Recommended reading

More for Mark 12:26

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:1-44Mark 12:1-44 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Mark 12:18-27Mark 12:18-27 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryA right knowledge of the Scripture, as the fountain whence all revealed religion now flows, and the foundation on which it is built, is the best preservative against error. Christ put aside the objection of the Sadducee…The Question of the SadduceesMark 12:18-27 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE QUESTION OF THE SADDUCEES. The Sadducees, who were the deists of that age, here attack our Lord Jesus, it should seem, not as the scribes, and Pharisees, and chief-priests, with any malicious design upon his person;…The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Mark 12:18-27 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe resurrection from the dead. A new class of antagonists now assail the great "Master" with a case of casuistry, designed evidently to bring the doctrine of the resurrection into contempt. "In the resurrection whose w…The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Mark 12:18-27 · The Pulpit CommentarySadducean error. I. DIFFICULTIES OF RELIEF ARE OFTEN IDLE LUXURIES OF THE MIND. One cannot suppose that these men were really troubled by such a question as they raised. It was sheer idleness, bred of useless school lif…The Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Mark 12:18-27 · The Pulpit CommentaryParallel passages: Matthew 22:23-33; Luke 20:27-40.— Question of the Sadducees touching the resurrection. I. IMPORTANCE OF THE QUESTION. Though the question propounded in this section was proposed for a captious purpose…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:1-44EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Mark 12:18-27A right knowledge of the Scripture, as the fountain whence all revealed religion now flows, and the foundation on which it is built, is the best preservative against error. Christ put aside the objection of the Sadducee…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Question of the SadduceesTHE QUESTION OF THE SADDUCEES. The Sadducees, who were the deists of that age, here attack our Lord Jesus, it should seem, not as the scribes, and Pharisees, and chief-priests, with any malicious design upon his person;…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Sadducees confuted. Of all the subjects which awaken the speculative curiosity and inquiry of men, none approaches, in dignity and importance, the future life. The nobler spirits, in every civilized and cultured communi…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Sadducean error. I. DIFFICULTIES OF RELIEF ARE OFTEN IDLE LUXURIES OF THE MIND. One cannot suppose that these men were really troubled by such a question as they raised. It was sheer idleness, bred of useless school lif…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27The resurrection from the dead. A new class of antagonists now assail the great "Master" with a case of casuistry, designed evidently to bring the doctrine of the resurrection into contempt. "In the resurrection whose w…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27Parallel passages: Matthew 22:23-33; Luke 20:27-40.— Question of the Sadducees touching the resurrection. I. IMPORTANCE OF THE QUESTION. Though the question propounded in this section was proposed for a captious purpose…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Mark 12:18-27The puzzle of the Sadducees. I. THE CASE STATED. An extreme one; and probably a locus classicus in the works of the rabbins. It was supposed to be a reductio ad absurdum of all theories of resurrection or immortality. "…Joseph S. Exell and contributors