Bible Commentary

Matthew 22:23-33

Matthew Henry on Matthew 22:23-33

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

The doctrines of Christ displeased the infidel Sadducees, as well as the Pharisees and Herodians. He carried the great truths of the resurrection and a future state, further than they had yet been reveled.

There is no arguing from the state of things in this world, as to what will take place hereafter. Let truth be set in a clear light, and it appears in full strength. Having thus silenced them, our Lord proceeded to show the truth of the doctrine of the resurrection from the books of Moses.

God declared to Moses that he was the God of the patriarchs, who had died long before; this shows that they were then in a state of being, capable of enjoying his favour, and proves that the doctrine of the resurrection is clearly taught in the Old Testament as well as in the New.

But this doctrine was kept for a more full revelation, after the resurrection of Christ, who was the first-fruits of them that slept. All errors arise from not knowing the Scriptures and the power of God.

In this world death takes away one after another, and so ends all earthly hopes, joys, sorrows, and connexions. How wretched are those who look for nothing better beyond the grave!

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 22:23-33

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Question of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Question Respecting MarriageTHE QUESTION RESPECTING MARRIAGE. We have here Christ's dispute with the Sadducees concerning the resurrection; it was the same day on which he was attacked by the Pharisees about paying tribute. Satan was now more busy…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23Denial of resurrection as a sign of mental mood. "The Sadducees, which say that there is no resurrection." It does not appear how their question helped the entanglement scheme. Possibly the design was to secure a statem…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33Third attack: The Sadducees and the resurrection. (Mark 12:18-27; Luke 20:27-40.)Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23The same day; on that day. This is still the Tuesday in the Holy Week. The Sadducees. There is no definite article here in the original. Which say; οἱλε Ìγοντες. Many good manuscripts and some modern editors (Laehmann,…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33The resurrection of the dead. When Jesus had disposed of the Pharisees and Herodians, the Sadducees approached him. They were the physicists—the materialists—of their time, who did not believe in angels or spirits, and…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33The Sadducees. I. THEIR CASE OF CASUISTRY. 1. Their doctrine. They held that there was no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit (Acts 23:8). Some of them now came to Christ, asserting their unbelief. They had not hith…Joseph S. Exell and contributors