DiscipleDeck
Get started
Bible Commentary

John 9:24

The Pulpit Commentary on John 9:24

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

So they ("the Jews") called a second time the man that was (had been) blind, and said unto him; no longer asking for any details of the process of the cure, they sought with ingenuity to blunt the edge of the powerful testimony which this man had borne to the prophetic rank and even Messianic claims of Jesus, by inducing him to recant.

Give glory to God, said they. Many have urged (see Calvin, De Wette, Lange, Lucke, and Meyer) that this is only a solemn form of adjuration, which corresponds with ; ; 3 Esdras 9:8, and was a hypocritical appeal to the man to eat his own words on oath; and Godet urges, "They demanded that this guilty assertion, 'He is a Prophet,' should be blotted out by the contrary one,' He is a sinner.'

" Moulton says, "A formula used when a criminal who was thought to be concealing the truth was being urged to make a full confession." Luthardt, Lampe, and others rightly observe that this adjuration theory, though it suits , does not fit or , and that the Pharisees rather wished the man to give glory direct to God, and not to Jesus.

They implied that their action was dictated by zeal for the honor of God, and tempted the man to disclaim the mediation of Divine grace through the lips and at the will of Jesus. They add, We know ( οἴδαμεν) absolutely, on theologic grounds beyond the comprehension of the poor man, and we can sustain it with all the weight of our tradition and custom—we know that this Man is a sinner.

They give no reference, and do not condescend to particulars. They would overawe the man with their assumption of superior knowledge.

Recommended reading

More for John 9:24

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on John 9:1-41John 9:1-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION These chapters (9. and 10.) bring the conflict with the Jews to a climax before the commencement of the Peraean ministry. They are doubtless closely connected with what has preceded; but the note of time (Joh…The Pulpit Commentary on John 9:1-41John 9:1-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe passage of a soul from darkness into light. This graphic and dramatic narrative begins with the healing of a bodily privation by the exercise el Christ's miraculous power. But its chief interest lies in the spiritua…The Pulpit Commentary on John 9:8-34John 9:8-34 · The Pulpit Commentary(9) The proof of the reality of the miracle, the antagonism of the Pharisees, and the persecution of the heated mad.The Cavilling of the Pharisees; The Cavilling of the Pharisees RefutedJohn 9:13-34 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE CAVILLING OF THE PHARISEES; THE CAVILLING OF THE PHARISEES REFUTED. One would have expected that such a miracle as Christ wrought upon the blind man would have settled his reputation, and silenced and shamed all opp…The Pulpit Commentary on John 9:13-34John 9:13-34 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe investigation of the miracle. This was prompted by the unfriendly questioners first referred to. I. THE INQUIRY OF THE PHARISEES. 1. They first examined the beggar as to the facts of his cure. These it was as imposs…Matthew Henry on John 9:24-34John 9:24-34 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryAs Christ's mercies are most valued by those who have felt the want of them, that have been blind, and now see; so the most powerful and lasting affections to Christ, arise from actual knowledge of him. In the work of g…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 9:1-41The passage of a soul from darkness into light. This graphic and dramatic narrative begins with the healing of a bodily privation by the exercise el Christ's miraculous power. But its chief interest lies in the spiritua…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 9:1-41EXPOSITION These chapters (9. and 10.) bring the conflict with the Jews to a climax before the commencement of the Peraean ministry. They are doubtless closely connected with what has preceded; but the note of time (Joh…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 9:8-34(9) The proof of the reality of the miracle, the antagonism of the Pharisees, and the persecution of the heated mad.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Cavilling of the Pharisees; The Cavilling of the Pharisees RefutedTHE CAVILLING OF THE PHARISEES; THE CAVILLING OF THE PHARISEES REFUTED. One would have expected that such a miracle as Christ wrought upon the blind man would have settled his reputation, and silenced and shamed all opp…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 9:13-34The investigation of the miracle. This was prompted by the unfriendly questioners first referred to. I. THE INQUIRY OF THE PHARISEES. 1. They first examined the beggar as to the facts of his cure. These it was as imposs…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on John 9:24-34As Christ's mercies are most valued by those who have felt the want of them, that have been blind, and now see; so the most powerful and lasting affections to Christ, arise from actual knowledge of him. In the work of g…Matthew Henry