Bible Commentary

John 21:23

The Pulpit Commentary on John 21:23

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

The untrustworthiness of tradition.

Tradition is the handing down from one person to another of what is not committed to writing. It is customary in those primitive societies where writing is unknown. It is practiced also in communities more advanced in civilization, when there is some special reason why it should be preferred to documentary preservation and transmission. That there was traditional teaching concerning our Lord's ministry is undoubted; and it has been disputed to what extent our Gospels embody such teaching. But this passage seems to have been inserted here as if to remind us how carefully coming ages of the Church have been preserved from a fruitful source of error.

I. THERE WERE PECULIAR REASONS WHY THE SAYING HERE RECORDED SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRESERVED IN ITS INTEGRITY.

1. In this case the saying concerning John was a saying of Christ, and as such might be supposed to be treasured with the greatest care and reverence.

2. It was uttered in the hearing of the select friends of our Lord, who, if any could do so, would guard it from corruption.

3. The apostles of Christ must have been the reporters of this saying to their fellow-Christians.

4. The person concerning whom the tradition went abroad was living at the time that the misrepresentation was repeated.

II. YET AN ALTOGETHER ERRONEOUS VERSION OF THIS SAYING WAS CURRENT IN THE EARLY CHURCH. Although Jesus had simply said to Peter, "If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?" which might be simply a strong way of rebuking curiosity, or an intimation that John should survive until the destruction of Jerusalem; yet there went abroad a notion that Jesus had expressly assured his beloved disciple that he should never die ] Could there be a more remarkable perversion of the Lord's words? a more signal instance of the untrustworthiness of oral tradition? Yet, what happened then has often happened before and since. Passing from one man's lips to another's, facts may dissolve into fictions, and opinions may be reversed.

III. THIS INSTANCE SUGGESTS HOW WISE AND MERCIFUL AN ARRANGEMENT IS THAT BY WHICH THE GOSPEL IS NOT LEFT TO ORAL TRADITION, BUT HAS BEEN EMBODIED IN AUTHENTICATED DOCUMENTS. By inspiring his apostles to commit the gospel facts to writing, our Lord has secured us against the mischiefs attending tradition. The truth cannot be injured either by the zeal of friends or by the malice of foes.

PRACTICAL LESSON. Readers of the New Testament are hound in reason to accept and credit what there is no room for any candid inquirer to distrust.—T.

Recommended reading

More for John 21:23

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on John 21:1-25John 21:1-25 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:1-25John 21:1-25 · The Pulpit Commentary3. The epilogue, answering to the prologue. The post-resurrection life corresponds with the pre-incarnate energy of the Logos. 1. Long and sustained controversy has prevailed on the question of the authenticity and apos…Matthew Henry on John 21:20-24John 21:20-24 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentarySufferings, pains, and death, will appear formidable even to the experienced Christian; but in the hope to glorify God, to leave a sinful world, and to be present with his Lord, he becomes ready to obey the Redeemer's c…Christ's Conference with Peter; Conclusion of John's GospelJohn 21:20-25 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleCHRIST'S CONFERENCE WITH PETER; CONCLUSION OF JOHN'S GOSPEL. In these verses, we have, I. The conference Christ had with Peter concerning John, the beloved disciple, in which we have, 1. The eye Peter cast upon him (Joh…The Pulpit Commentary on John 21:20-23John 21:20-23 · The Pulpit Commentary(3) The revelations made to patient waiting for the coming of the Lord, with correction of a misunderstanding touching the disciple whom Jesus loved.The Pulpit Commentary on John 21:20-23John 21:20-23 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe mystery of John's future. The Apostle Peter began to follow Jesus as he went forth, and, turning round, saw John following. He is anxious to know the future destiny of his fellow-disciple. I. PETER'S QUESTION CONCER…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:1-253. The epilogue, answering to the prologue. The post-resurrection life corresponds with the pre-incarnate energy of the Logos. 1. Long and sustained controversy has prevailed on the question of the authenticity and apos…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:1-25EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on John 21:20-24Sufferings, pains, and death, will appear formidable even to the experienced Christian; but in the hope to glorify God, to leave a sinful world, and to be present with his Lord, he becomes ready to obey the Redeemer's c…Matthew HenrycommentaryChrist's Conference with Peter; Conclusion of John's GospelCHRIST'S CONFERENCE WITH PETER; CONCLUSION OF JOHN'S GOSPEL. In these verses, we have, I. The conference Christ had with Peter concerning John, the beloved disciple, in which we have, 1. The eye Peter cast upon him (Joh…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:20-23The mystery of John's future. The Apostle Peter began to follow Jesus as he went forth, and, turning round, saw John following. He is anxious to know the future destiny of his fellow-disciple. I. PETER'S QUESTION CONCER…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:20-23(3) The revelations made to patient waiting for the coming of the Lord, with correction of a misunderstanding touching the disciple whom Jesus loved.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on John 21:23We need not be surprised that the sublime meaning of these words, "Wait while I am ever coming to him," should have been misunderstood. Therefore this word went forth to the brethren. The designation, "brethren," only o…Joseph S. Exell and contributors