Bible Commentary

Acts 15:37

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:37

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Was minded for determined, A.V. and T.R.; John also for John, A.V. and T.R.; who was called for whose surname was, A.V. Was minded. It is doubtful which is the true reading, ἐβουλεύσατο or ἐβούλετο.

The difference of meaning is small. The first means "took council with himself," i.e. planned, thought, to take Barnabas; the second, "wished," i.e. his deliberate will was to take Barnabas. Singularly enough, Alford, who rejects ἐβούλετο, which is the reading of R.

T., translates ἐβουλεύετο by "was minded," which is the translation of ἐβούλετο in the R.V. We see in this choice of Mark by Barnabas the natural partiality of a near relation. We may also see the same flexibility of disposition which made him yield to the influence of the emissaries of James ().

Who was called. It might seem odd that this description of John should be repeated here after having been given in . But perhaps it was usual so to designate him (see ; ; ; ; ).

Recommended reading

More for Acts 15:37

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:1-41Acts 15:1-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Acts 15:36-41Acts 15:36-41 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryHere we have a private quarrel between two ministers, no less than Paul and Barnabas, yet made to end well. Barnabas wished his nephew John Mark to go with them. We should suspect ourselves of being partial, and guard a…Disagreement between Paul and BarnabasActs 15:36-41 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleDISAGREEMENT BETWEEN PAUL AND BARNABAS. We have seen one unhappy difference among the brethren, which was of a public nature, brought to a good issue; but here we have a private quarrel between two ministers, no less me…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Acts 15:36-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryBeginning of the second missionary journey. The dissension of Paul and Barnabas, painful in itself, may yield useful matter of reflection. HUMAN INFIRMITY IS MATURE CHRISTIANS. 1. The fact of it. Paul judged severely of…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Acts 15:36-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryContention amongst brethren. Importance of the record as showing: 1. The sincerity and simplicity of the Christian writers. An impostor would never have inserted such a fact. 2. The overruling grace of God. The treasure…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Acts 15:36-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe paroxysm. The proposal of two friends whose fast friendship was of many years' standing; of two brethren loving and beloved; of two apostles of Jesus Christ, who had long labored together to win souls to Christ and…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:1-41EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Acts 15:36-41Here we have a private quarrel between two ministers, no less than Paul and Barnabas, yet made to end well. Barnabas wished his nephew John Mark to go with them. We should suspect ourselves of being partial, and guard a…Matthew HenrycommentaryDisagreement between Paul and BarnabasDISAGREEMENT BETWEEN PAUL AND BARNABAS. We have seen one unhappy difference among the brethren, which was of a public nature, brought to a good issue; but here we have a private quarrel between two ministers, no less me…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Apostles at fault. When a grave and critical juncture had been safely passed without damage done to any, there arose a quarrel about an unimportant and insignificant matter, which had regrettable, not to say deplorable,…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Beginning of the second missionary journey. The dissension of Paul and Barnabas, painful in itself, may yield useful matter of reflection. HUMAN INFIRMITY IS MATURE CHRISTIANS. 1. The fact of it. Paul judged severely of…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Contention amongst brethren. Importance of the record as showing: 1. The sincerity and simplicity of the Christian writers. An impostor would never have inserted such a fact. 2. The overruling grace of God. The treasure…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41The paroxysm. The proposal of two friends whose fast friendship was of many years' standing; of two brethren loving and beloved; of two apostles of Jesus Christ, who had long labored together to win souls to Christ and…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:37-39Symptoms more starting. There is a sense in which human nature and Christian principle are opposed to each other. When in conflict they are indeed two rare antagonists. It is astonishing at how many angles the former ca…Joseph S. Exell and contributors