Bible Commentary

Acts 15:38

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:38

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Take with them him for take him with them, A.V.; withdrew for departed, A.V. Withdrew. The Greek word ἀποστάντα (from which comes the substantive apostasy) is a strong one, and denotes decided blame, as does the indication of the opposite course, by way of contrast, which he did not take.

"He did not go with them to the work" to which God called them, as he ought to have done. The whole phrase, too, which follows is strongly worded. "Paul thought good," as regards one who had turned back from the work, "not to take that man."

The μὴ συμπαραλαβεῖν of is, as Meyer observes, sharply opposed to the συμπαραλαβεῖν of . Luke evidently sides strongly with Paul, and almost reproduces the ipsissima verba of the "sharp contention."

One would infer that this passage was penned by Luke before the reconciliation which appears in , and that we have here an indication of the early date of the publication of "The Acts."

Perhaps also there is an indication in the narrative, coupled with Mark's subsequent attach-merit to Peter, that Mark rather leant at this time to Judaizing views, and that his previous departure "from the work" was partly owing to a want of complete sympathy with St.

Paul's doctrine. St. Paul would have no half-hearted helper in his grand and arduous work.

Recommended reading

More for Acts 15:38

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:1-41Acts 15:1-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Acts 15:36-41Acts 15:36-41 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryHere we have a private quarrel between two ministers, no less than Paul and Barnabas, yet made to end well. Barnabas wished his nephew John Mark to go with them. We should suspect ourselves of being partial, and guard a…Disagreement between Paul and BarnabasActs 15:36-41 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleDISAGREEMENT BETWEEN PAUL AND BARNABAS. We have seen one unhappy difference among the brethren, which was of a public nature, brought to a good issue; but here we have a private quarrel between two ministers, no less me…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Acts 15:36-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryContention amongst brethren. Importance of the record as showing: 1. The sincerity and simplicity of the Christian writers. An impostor would never have inserted such a fact. 2. The overruling grace of God. The treasure…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Acts 15:36-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryApostles at fault. When a grave and critical juncture had been safely passed without damage done to any, there arose a quarrel about an unimportant and insignificant matter, which had regrettable, not to say deplorable,…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Acts 15:36-41 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe paroxysm. The proposal of two friends whose fast friendship was of many years' standing; of two brethren loving and beloved; of two apostles of Jesus Christ, who had long labored together to win souls to Christ and…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:1-41EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Acts 15:36-41Here we have a private quarrel between two ministers, no less than Paul and Barnabas, yet made to end well. Barnabas wished his nephew John Mark to go with them. We should suspect ourselves of being partial, and guard a…Matthew HenrycommentaryDisagreement between Paul and BarnabasDISAGREEMENT BETWEEN PAUL AND BARNABAS. We have seen one unhappy difference among the brethren, which was of a public nature, brought to a good issue; but here we have a private quarrel between two ministers, no less me…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Apostles at fault. When a grave and critical juncture had been safely passed without damage done to any, there arose a quarrel about an unimportant and insignificant matter, which had regrettable, not to say deplorable,…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Beginning of the second missionary journey. The dissension of Paul and Barnabas, painful in itself, may yield useful matter of reflection. HUMAN INFIRMITY IS MATURE CHRISTIANS. 1. The fact of it. Paul judged severely of…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41Contention amongst brethren. Importance of the record as showing: 1. The sincerity and simplicity of the Christian writers. An impostor would never have inserted such a fact. 2. The overruling grace of God. The treasure…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:36-41The paroxysm. The proposal of two friends whose fast friendship was of many years' standing; of two brethren loving and beloved; of two apostles of Jesus Christ, who had long labored together to win souls to Christ and…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 15:37-39Symptoms more starting. There is a sense in which human nature and Christian principle are opposed to each other. When in conflict they are indeed two rare antagonists. It is astonishing at how many angles the former ca…Joseph S. Exell and contributors