Bible Commentary

Acts 16:12

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:12

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

A city of Macedonia, the first of the district, a Roman colony for the chief city of that part of Macedonia, and a colony, A.V.: this for that, A.V.; tarrying for abiding, A.V. A city of Macedonia, etc.

This is a difficult sentence. The natural way of construing the words undoubtedly is, as in the A.V., "which is the chief city of the [or, ' that'] district of Macedonia, and a colony." The only difficulty in the way of so taking it is that when AEmilius Paulus, as related by Livy (xlv.

29), divided the conquered kingdom of Macedonia into four districts (regiones or partes), Amphi-pelts was made the capital of the district.in which Philippi was situated. But the epithet πρώτη does not necessarily mean the capital; it is found on coins applied to cities which were not capitals.

Besides, in the interval of above two hundred years between AEmilius Paulus and St. Paul, it is very probable that the city of Philippi, with its gold-mines and its privileges as a colony, may have really become the capital.

And so Lewin, following Wetstein, understands it. We know that in the reign of Theodosius the Younger, when Macedonia was divided into two provinces, Philippi became the ecclesiastical head of Macedonia Prima.

It had been made a colony by Augustus Caesar, with the name "Col. Jul. Aug. Philip.," i.e. Colonia Augusta Julia Philippensis ('Dict. of Greek and Roman Geog.'). It must, therefore, anyhow have been a place of first-rate importance at this time.

Those, however, who do not accept this explanation, couple κολωνία with πόλις, "which is the first colony-city," etc, Others take πρώτη in a local sense, "the first city you come to in Macedonia" (Conybeare and Howson, Alford, Bengel, etc.

). The R.V. seems to take ἥτις ἐστὶ … ΄ακεδονίας πόλις together, and πρώτη τῆς μερίδος as a further description of it—a most awkward construction. Alford renders it, "which is the first Macedonian city of the district.'

But the natural way of construing a passage is almost always the best, and nothing prevents us from believing that St. Luke, who knew Philippi intimately, was strictly accurate in calling it "the chief city of the district of Macedonia," i.

e. the district in which it was situated. That μέρις is the technical name of the division of a province appears from the title μεριδάρχης, applied by Josephus to a certain Apollonius, governor, under Antiochus Epiphanes, of the district in which Samaria was included ('Ant.

Jud.,' 12. ). The ancient name of Philippi was Dates first, then Krenides—the springs, or wells; and the word used by Livy of the districts of Macedonia, pars prima, secunda, etc., is an exact translation of μέρις It received the name of Philippi, from Philip, the father of Alexander the Great, who extracted a great revenue from its gold-mines.

Its great historical celebrity arises from the battle in the plain of Philippi, in which the republican party, under Brutus and Cassius, received its death-blow from Octavius and Antony. (For a full description of Philippi, and of the privileges of a colony, see Conybeare and Howson, vol.

1.311, etc., and Lewin, vol. 1. .) This. Alford, following certain manuscripts, reads αὐτῇ, "in the city itself," as distinguished from the place outside the city, where the προσευχή was.

But, perhaps, St. Luke uses the word "this" from Philippi being the place of his own residence, and where he may have drawn up the narrative on the spot.

Recommended reading

More for Acts 16:12

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:1-40Acts 16:1-40 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONMatthew Henry on Acts 16:6-15Acts 16:6-15 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe removals of ministers, and the dispensing the means of grace by them, are in particular under Divine conduct and direction. We must follow Providence: and whatever we seek to do, if that suffer us not, we ought to s…Paul Invited into Macedonia; The Conversion of LydiaActs 16:6-15 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BiblePAUL INVITED INTO MACEDONIA; THE CONVERSION OF LYDIA. In these verses we have, I. Paul's travels up and down to do good. 1. He and Silas his colleague went throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, where, it should…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:6-12Acts 16:6-12 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe Spirit's course. It may be laid down as a canon, that the facts marking periods of special gifts and special inspiration and special "dispensations" point to principles available for other periods in the whole histo…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:6-15Acts 16:6-15 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe call. The great difference between sacred and profane history is not so much that the events are different, or the human motives of the actors are different, or even that God's providence works differently, but that…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:9-15Acts 16:9-15 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe journey to -Macedonia: the happy beginning. The transplantation of the gospel into Europe was a great epoch. We see the seed-corn of the kingdom germinating and growing from small beginnings. I. THE PROVIDENTIAL IND…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:1-40EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Acts 16:6-15The removals of ministers, and the dispensing the means of grace by them, are in particular under Divine conduct and direction. We must follow Providence: and whatever we seek to do, if that suffer us not, we ought to s…Matthew HenrycommentaryPaul Invited into Macedonia; The Conversion of LydiaPAUL INVITED INTO MACEDONIA; THE CONVERSION OF LYDIA. In these verses we have, I. Paul's travels up and down to do good. 1. He and Silas his colleague went throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, where, it should…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:6-12The Spirit's course. It may be laid down as a canon, that the facts marking periods of special gifts and special inspiration and special "dispensations" point to principles available for other periods in the whole histo…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:6-15The call. The great difference between sacred and profane history is not so much that the events are different, or the human motives of the actors are different, or even that God's providence works differently, but that…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:9-15The journey to -Macedonia: the happy beginning. The transplantation of the gospel into Europe was a great epoch. We see the seed-corn of the kingdom germinating and growing from small beginnings. I. THE PROVIDENTIAL IND…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:11-15(or Acts 16:14) The opened heart. "And a certain woman named Lydia," etc. Study of personal history specially helpful. A few broad strokes make up the picture. Fill in the outline from human nature and experience. Descr…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 16:11-15The opened heart; or, the power of Divine gentleness. Promptly obedient to the heavenly vision, Paul and Silas went "with a straight course to Samothracia," and by Neapolis to Philippi. There, eagerly awaiting a sacred…Joseph S. Exell and contributors