Bible Commentary

Acts 26:24

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:24

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Made his defense for spake for himself, A.V. ( ἀπολογουμένου, as ); saith for said, A.V.; mad for beside thyself, A.V.; thy much for much, A.V.; turn thee to madness for make thee mad, A.V.

With a loud voice. Another detail, betraying the eyewitness of the scene described. Thou art mad ( μαίνῃ); ; ; . Much learning ( τὰ πολλά γράμματα). So , "How knoweth this man letters ( γράμματα)?"

is equivalent to Whence hath this man this wisdom? (). And ἀγράμματος in is "unlearned." The excited interruption by Festus shows that he was unable to accept the truths enunciated by the apostle.

The ideas of fulfilled prophecy, and of the resurrection of the dead, and of a crucified Jew giving light to the great Roman world, were" foolishness unto him," because he lacked spiritual discernment.

He thought the apostle's glowing words must be the outcome of a disordered mind. Turn thee to madness ( εἰς μανίαν περιτρέπει). The word μανία (mania) occurs only here in the New Testament. But it is the technical name in medical writers for the disease of μανία, mania, and is also common in classical writers.

The verb for "doth turn" ( περιτρέπει) is also peculiar to St. Luke, being found only in this place. It is used by Plato, but specially by medical writers, as is also the substantive formed from it, περιτροπή, spoken of the "turn" taken by a disease, and the simple verb τρέπει and τρέπεται: e.

g. ἔτρεψε γνώμην ἐς μανίην: ἐς σκυθρωππὸν ἡ μανίη τρέπεται: τοῖς μαινομένοισι ἄλλοτε μὲν ἐς ὀῥγὴν ἄλλοτε δὲ ἐς θυμηδίαν (mirth) ἡγνώμη τρέπεται, etc..

Recommended reading

More for Acts 26:24

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32Acts 26:1-32 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe apostolic defense in the presence of Festus and Agrippa. I. THE BEARING OF THE MAN. Dignity, gentleness, courtesy—a true Christian gentleman. II. THE APPEAL TO FACTS. The incontrovertible evidence. "Once I was a per…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32Acts 26:1-32 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-26Acts 26:1-26 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe apology. We are struck with a contrast between the conduct of our Lord when he stood before the bar of Caiaphas and of Pontius Pilate, and that of St. Paul when he was brought before Festus and Agrippa. It is writte…The Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32Acts 26:1-32 · The Pulpit CommentaryPaul before Festus and Agrippa. His address may be divided as follows:— I. THE REMARKABLE STORY OF HIS LIFE. (Acts 26:1-18.) 1. His life in Judaism. He had been brought up, as all knew, in the strictest sect of his reli…Matthew Henry on Acts 26:24-32Acts 26:24-32 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryIt becomes us, on all occasions, to speak the words of truth and soberness, and then we need not be troubled at the unjust censures of men. Active and laborious followers of the gospel often have been despised as dreame…Paul's Fifth DefenceActs 26:24-44 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BiblePAUL'S FIFTH DEFENCE. We have reason to think that Paul had a great deal more to say in defence of the gospel he preached, and for the honour of it, and to recommend it to the good opinion of this noble audience; he had…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32Paul before Festus and Agrippa. His address may be divided as follows:— I. THE REMARKABLE STORY OF HIS LIFE. (Acts 26:1-18.) 1. His life in Judaism. He had been brought up, as all knew, in the strictest sect of his reli…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-26The apology. We are struck with a contrast between the conduct of our Lord when he stood before the bar of Caiaphas and of Pontius Pilate, and that of St. Paul when he was brought before Festus and Agrippa. It is writte…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:1-32The apostolic defense in the presence of Festus and Agrippa. I. THE BEARING OF THE MAN. Dignity, gentleness, courtesy—a true Christian gentleman. II. THE APPEAL TO FACTS. The incontrovertible evidence. "Once I was a per…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Acts 26:24-32It becomes us, on all occasions, to speak the words of truth and soberness, and then we need not be troubled at the unjust censures of men. Active and laborious followers of the gospel often have been despised as dreame…Matthew HenrycommentaryPaul's Fifth DefencePAUL'S FIFTH DEFENCE. We have reason to think that Paul had a great deal more to say in defence of the gospel he preached, and for the honour of it, and to recommend it to the good opinion of this noble audience; he had…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:24-26An unwilling contribution to the truth. The phenomena presented by Festus when, in struggling to insult the truth, he strengthens the body of testimony to it, are to be noticed. They are simply as follows:— I. FESTUS CA…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Acts 26:24-28The Christian's desire. The point of deepest interest in this scene is Paul's reply to Agrippa. There the nobility of the apostle is conspicuously present. But it is worth while to glance, first, at— I. THE BLINDNESS OF…Joseph S. Exell and contributors