Bible Commentary

Romans 7:1-6

The Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-6

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Here comes in the third illustration of the moral obligation of the baptized. It rests on the recognized principle that death cancels the claims of human law on a person (cf. ); and this with especial reference to the law of marriage, as being peculiarly applicable to the subject to be illustrated, since the Church is elsewhere regarded as married to Christ.

As has been observed above, it is from the Law that Christians are now said to be emancipated in the death of Christ; not from sin, as in the previous sections. Hence this section might at first sight seem to introduce a new line of thought.

But it is really a continuation of the same, though differently viewed; for, in the sense intended by St. Paul, being under the Law is equivalent to being under sin. How this is has already more or less appeared; and it will be shown further in the latter part of this chapter.

For elucidating the connection of thought between this and the preceding sections, it may be here briefly stated thus: A fundamental axiom with the apostle is that "where no law is, there is no transgression" (; cf.

; ); i.e. without law of some kind (including in the idea both external law and the law of conscience) to reveal to man the difference between right and wrong, he is not held responsible; to be a sinner before God he must know what sin is.

Human sin consists in a man doing wrong, knowing it to be wrong; or, at any rate, with an original power and opportunity of knowing it to be so. (This, be it observed, is the idea running through the whole of .

, in which all mankind are convicted of sin; the whole drift of the argument being that they had sinned against knowledge.) Law, then, in making sin known to man, subjects him to its guilt, and consequently to its condemnation.

But this is all it does; it is all that, in itself, it can do. It can remove neither the guilt nor the dominion of sin. Its principle is simply to exact entire obedience to its requirements; and there it leaves the sinner.

The above view applies to all law, and of course peculiarly to the Mosaic Law (which the writer has all along mainly in view) in proportion to the authority of its source and the strictness of its requirements.

Thus it is that St. Paul regards being under the Law as the same thing as being under sin, and dying to the Law as the same thing as dying to sin. Grace, on the other hand, under which we pass in rising again with Christ, does both the things which law cannot do: it both cancels the guilt of sin (repentance and faith presumed), and also imparts power to overcome it.

Recommended reading

More for Romans 7:1-6

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Romans 7:1-6Romans 7:1-6 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentarySo long as a man continues under the law as a covenant, and seeks justification by his own obedience, he continues the slave of sin in some form. Nothing but the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus, can make any sinner free…Observations Respecting the Law. (a. d. 58.)Romans 7:1-6 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleOBSERVATIONS RESPECTING THE LAW. (A. D. 58.) Among other arguments used in the foregoing chapter to persuade us against sin, and to holiness, this was one (Romans 6:14), that we are not under the law; and this argument…The Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-25Romans 7:1-25 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1Romans 7:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryAre ye ignorant, brethren (for I speak to persons knowing law), how that the Law hath dominion over a man for so long time as he liveth? i.e. so long as the man liveth; not so long as the Law liveth in the sense of vige…The Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-17Romans 7:1-17 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe position of the Law under the New Testament. The apostle is here continuing his discussion of the immoral suggestion to which he alluded in the previous chapter (Romans 7:15), "What then? shall we sin, because we ar…The Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-6Romans 7:1-6 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe two unions. The apostle has spoken of freedom from the Law, and of the new reign of grace; but lest this freedom should be disputed, he here establishes it. The Mosaic Law, as such, touches only this present life; d…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Romans 7:1-6So long as a man continues under the law as a covenant, and seeks justification by his own obedience, he continues the slave of sin in some form. Nothing but the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus, can make any sinner free…Matthew HenrycommentaryObservations Respecting the Law. (a. d. 58.)OBSERVATIONS RESPECTING THE LAW. (A. D. 58.) Among other arguments used in the foregoing chapter to persuade us against sin, and to holiness, this was one (Romans 6:14), that we are not under the law; and this argument…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-6The two marriages of the soul. In the preceding chapter we saw how justification leads of necessity to sanctification. Once we realize that we have died in Jesus for sin, we are spiritually prompted to enter with a rise…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-6The two unions. The apostle has spoken of freedom from the Law, and of the new reign of grace; but lest this freedom should be disputed, he here establishes it. The Mosaic Law, as such, touches only this present life; d…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-25EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1Are ye ignorant, brethren (for I speak to persons knowing law), how that the Law hath dominion over a man for so long time as he liveth? i.e. so long as the man liveth; not so long as the Law liveth in the sense of vige…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:1-17The position of the Law under the New Testament. The apostle is here continuing his discussion of the immoral suggestion to which he alluded in the previous chapter (Romans 7:15), "What then? shall we sin, because we ar…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Romans 7:2-4For (this is an instance of the application of the general principle, adduced as suiting the subject in band) the woman that hath an husband ( ὕπανδρος, implying subjection, meaning properly, that is under an husband)…Joseph S. Exell and contributors