Matthew Henry on Luke 23:1-5

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

Pilate well understood the difference between armed forces and our Lord's followers. But instead of being softened by Pilate's declaration of his innocence, and considering whether they were not bringing the guilt of innocent blood upon themselves, the Jews were the more angry.

The Lord brings his designs to a glorious end, even by means of those who follow the devices of their own hearts. Thus all parties joined, so as to prove the innocence of Jesus, who was the atoning sacrifice for our sins.

More for Luke 23:1-5

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Christ before Pilate and Herod; Christ Accused and InsultedLuke 23:1-12 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleCHRIST BEFORE PILATE AND HEROD; CHRIST ACCUSED AND INSULTED. Our Lord Jesus was condemned as a blasphemer in the spiritual court, but it was the most impotent malice that could be that this court was actuated by; for, w…The Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1-56Luke 23:1-56 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION The Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1-4Luke 23:1-4 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe trial before Pilate: First examination.The Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1Luke 23:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryAnd the whole multitude of them arose, and led him unto Pilate. The Sanhedrin had now formally condemned Jesus to death. They were, however, precluded by the Roman regulations then in force from carrying out their judgm…The Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1-3Luke 23:1-3 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe Divine kingdom. Deeply interesting is this interview between the Nazarene and the Roman, the Jewish Prisoner and the Roman judge; the one then brought forth as a malefactor and now seated on the throne of the world,…The Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1-25Luke 23:1-25 · The Pulpit CommentaryJesus vindicated by his enemies. We pass now from the ecclesiastical to the secular sphere. The charge brought forward in the Sanhedrin is blasphemy; before Pilate and Herod the charge must be sedition and treason. Yet…

commentaryChrist before Pilate and Herod; Christ Accused and InsultedCHRIST BEFORE PILATE AND HEROD; CHRIST ACCUSED AND INSULTED. Our Lord Jesus was condemned as a blasphemer in the spiritual court, but it was the most impotent malice that could be that this court was actuated by; for, w…Matthew Henry commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1-25Jesus vindicated by his enemies. We pass now from the ecclesiastical to the secular sphere. The charge brought forward in the Sanhedrin is blasphemy; before Pilate and Herod the charge must be sedition and treason. Yet…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1-56EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1-4The trial before Pilate: First examination.Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1And the whole multitude of them arose, and led him unto Pilate. The Sanhedrin had now formally condemned Jesus to death. They were, however, precluded by the Roman regulations then in force from carrying out their judgm…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:1-3The Divine kingdom. Deeply interesting is this interview between the Nazarene and the Roman, the Jewish Prisoner and the Roman judge; the one then brought forth as a malefactor and now seated on the throne of the world,…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:2And they began to accuse him, saying, We found this fellow perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, saying that he himself Christ a King. To understand this scene perfectly we must read St. John'…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Luke 23:3And Pilate asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews? Pilate then went again into his judgment-hall, where he had left Jesus, but before going back he could not resist addressing an ironical word to the accusing…Joseph S. Exell and contributors