Bible Commentary

Leviticus 13:1-17

Matthew Henry on Leviticus 13:1-17

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

The plague of leprosy was an uncleanness, rather than a disease. Christ is said to cleanse lepers, not to cure them. Common as the leprosy was among the Hebrews, during and after their residence in Egypt, we have no reason to believe that it was known among them before.

Their distressed state and employment in that land must have rendered them liable to disease. But it was a plague often inflicted immediately by the hand of God. Miriam's leprosy, and Gehazi's, and king Uzziah's, were punishments of particular sins; no marvel there was care taken to distinguish it from a common distemper.

The judgment of it was referred to the priests. And it was a figure of the moral pollutions of men's minds by sin, which is the leprosy of the soul, defiling to the conscience, and from which Christ alone can cleanse.

The priest could only convict the leper, (by the law is the knowledge of sin,) but Christ can cure the sinner, he can take away sin. It is a work of great importance, but of great difficulty, to judge of our spiritual state.

We all have cause to suspect ourselves, being conscious of sores and spots; but whether clean or unclean is the question. As there were certain marks by which to know it was leprosy, so there are marks of such as are in the gall of bitterness.

The priest must take time in making his judgment. This teaches all, both ministers and people, not to be hasty in censures, nor to judge anything before the time. If some men's sins go before unto judgment, the sins of others follow after, and so do men's good works.

If the person suspected were found to be clean, yet he must wash his clothes, because there had been ground for the suspicion. We have need to be washed in the blood of Christ from our spots, though not leprosy spots; for who can say, I am pure from sin?

Recommended reading

More for Leviticus 13:1-17

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Law Concerning Leprosy. (b. c. 1490.)Leviticus 13:1-17 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE LAW CONCERNING LEPROSY. (B. C. 1490.) I. Concerning the plague of leprosy we may observe in general, 1. That it was rather an uncleanness than a disease; or, at least, so the law considered it, and therefore employe…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-46Leviticus 13:1-46 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION UNCLEANNESS DERIVED FROM LEPROSY OR CONTACT WITH LEPERS AND LEPROUS THINGS (Leviticus 13:1-59, Leviticus 14:1-57). A third cause of uncleanness is found in a third class of offensive or repulsive objects. The…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59Leviticus 13:1-59 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe diagnosis of sin as illustrated in the leprosy. cf. 2 Kings 5:1-27 : Psalms 88:1-18; Matthew 8:1-4; Luke 5:12-15. The preceding chapter brings forward sin as an inheritance through ordinary generation. No thorough s…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59Leviticus 13:1-59 · The Pulpit CommentaryLeprosy. That leprosy is a type of sin is evident from David's allusion in confessing his own horrible offenses (see Psalms 51:7)? This also appears from the words of Jesus to the only leper, out of the ten cleansed by…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59Leviticus 13:1-59 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe priest's adjudication. We have considered the plague of leprosy as an emblem of sin; the adjudication upon it will suggest thoughts concerning the treatment of sin. In this business the principal actor was the pries…
commentaryThe Law Concerning Leprosy. (b. c. 1490.)THE LAW CONCERNING LEPROSY. (B. C. 1490.) I. Concerning the plague of leprosy we may observe in general, 1. That it was rather an uncleanness than a disease; or, at least, so the law considered it, and therefore employe…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59Leprosy. That leprosy is a type of sin is evident from David's allusion in confessing his own horrible offenses (see Psalms 51:7)? This also appears from the words of Jesus to the only leper, out of the ten cleansed by…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59The priest's adjudication. We have considered the plague of leprosy as an emblem of sin; the adjudication upon it will suggest thoughts concerning the treatment of sin. In this business the principal actor was the pries…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59The diagnosis of sin as illustrated in the leprosy. cf. 2 Kings 5:1-27 : Psalms 88:1-18; Matthew 8:1-4; Luke 5:12-15. The preceding chapter brings forward sin as an inheritance through ordinary generation. No thorough s…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-46EXPOSITION UNCLEANNESS DERIVED FROM LEPROSY OR CONTACT WITH LEPERS AND LEPROUS THINGS (Leviticus 13:1-59, Leviticus 14:1-57). A third cause of uncleanness is found in a third class of offensive or repulsive objects. The…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:2The word translated plague of leprosy literally means stroke. It seems to be used in the sense of spot. Then shall he be brought unto Aaron the priest. That the regulations respecting leprosy were not sanitary arrangeme…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:3It is a plague of leprosy. The chosen type of sin—its individual aspect. The conjecture that leprosy was contracted by the children of Israel in the hot and dusty brick-fields of Egypt is probable enough. The definition…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:3When the hair in the plague is turned white. This is the first symptom, and the most noticeable as the commencement of the disease. The hair around the spot loses its colour and becomes thin and weak, the separate hairs…Joseph S. Exell and contributors