Matthew Henry on Galatians 2:11-14

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

Notwithstanding Peter's character, yet, when Paul saw him acting so as to hurt the truth of the gospel and the peace of the church, he was not afraid to reprove him. When he saw that Peter and the others did not live up to that principle which the gospel taught, and which they professed, namely, That by the death of Christ the partition wall between Jew and Gentile was taken down, and the observance of the law of Moses was no longer in force; as Peter's offence was public, he publicly reproved him.

There is a very great difference between the prudence of St. Paul, who bore with, and used for a time, the ceremonies of the law as not sinful, and the timid conduct of St. Peter, who, by withdrawing from the Gentiles, led others to think that these ceremonies were necessary.

More for Galatians 2:11-14

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Galatians 2:1-21EXPOSITION In the preceding chapter, St. Paul has been concerned to make clear the position that neither the gospel which he preached nor the commission which he held was derived from the older apostles- the history of…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryPeter Reproved by Paul. (a. d. 56.)PETER REPROVED BY PAUL. (A. D. 56.) I. From the account which Paul gives of what passed between him and the other apostles at Jerusalem, the Galatians might easily discern both the falseness of what his enemies had insi…Matthew Henry commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Galatians 2:11In the narrative which the apostle next proceeds to give, several points, we may suppose, were definitely meant by him to be intimated to his readers. Thus to those Gentile Galatians who were wavering in their attachmen…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Galatians 2:11-14The apostle's rebuke of Peter at Antioch. There is no record of this scene elsewhere in Scripture. It is a further proof of the apostle's independence as well as of his devotion to Christian liberty. I. CONSIDER THE CON…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Galatians 2:11-18The apostolic strife at Antioch. Passing from the Jerusalem conference, Paul next mentions the strife which Peter and he had at Antioch. Peter had come down to see the work of God among the Gentiles. In his large-hearte…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Galatians 2:11-21Withstanding of Peter at Antioch. "But when Cephas came to Antioch, I resisted him to the face." From the public conference at Jerusalem, Paul and Barnabas went down to Antioch, where, it is said, they tarried. They sep…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Galatians 2:11A bold rebuke. There can be no doubt that this rebuke offered by one apostle to another was real and earnest, and not, as St. Jerome tried to maintain, a dramatic pretence. We have here, then, the startling spectacle of…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Galatians 2:12For before that certain came from James ( πρὸ τοῦ γὰρ ἐλθεῖν τινὰς ἀπὸ ἰακώβου). Since the apostle writes "from James," and not "from Judaea" (as Acts 15:1) or "from Jerusalem," the surmise suggests itself tha…Joseph S. Exell and contributors