Bible Commentary

Joshua 15:20-63

The Lot of Judah. (b. c. 1444.)

Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible · Matthew Henry · Public domain; electronic edition by Christian Classics Ethereal Library

THE LOT OF JUDAH. (B. C. 1444.)

We have here a list of the several cities that fell within the lot of the tribe of Judah, which are mentioned by name, that they might know their own, and both keep it and keep to it, and might neither through cowardice nor sloth lose the possession of what was their own.

I. The cities are here named, and numbered in several classes, which they then could account for the reason of better than we can now. Here are, 1. Some that are said to be the uttermost cities towards the coast of Edom, . Here are thirty-eight named, and yet said to be twenty-nine (), because nine of these were afterwards transferred to the lot of Simeon, and are reckoned as belonging to that, as appears by comparing , &c.; therefore those only are counted (though the rest are named) which remained to Judah. 2. Others that are said to be in the valley () are counted to be fourteen, yet fifteen are named; but it is probable that Gederah and Gederathaim were either two names or two parts of one and the same city. 3. Then sixteen are named without any head of distinction, , and nine more, . 4. Then the three Philistine-cities, Ekron, Ashdod, and Gaza, . 5. Cities in the mountains, eleven in all (), nine more (), ten more (), six more (), then two (), and six in the wilderness, a part of the country not so thick of inhabitants as some others were.

II. Now here, 1. We do not find Bethlehem, which was afterwards the city of David, and was ennobled by the birth of our Lord Jesus in it. But that city, which at the best was but little among the thousands of Judah (), except that it was thus dignified, was now so little as not to be accounted one of the cities, but perhaps was one of the villages not named. Christ came to give honour to the places he was related to, not to receive honour from them. 2. Jerusalem is said to continue in the hands of the Jebusites (), for the children of Judah could not drive them out, through their sluggishness, stupidity, and unbelief. Had they attempted it with vigour and resolution, we have reason to think God would not have been wanting to them to give them success; but they could not do it, because they would not. Jerusalem was afterwards to be the holy city, the royal city, the city of the great King, the brightest ornament of all the land of Israel. God has designed it should be so. It may therefore be justly looked upon as a punishment of their neglect to conquer other cities which God had given them that they were so long kept out of this. 3. Among the cities of Judah (in all 114) we meet with Libnah, which in Joram's days revolted, and probably set up for a free independent state (), and Lachish, where king Amaziah was slain (); it led the dance in idolatry (); it was the beginning of sin to the daughter of Zion. Giloh, Ahithophel's town, is here mentioned, and Tekoa, of which the prophet Amos was, and near which Jehoshaphat obtained that glorious victory, , &c., and Maresha, where Asa was a conqueror. Many of the cities of this tribe occur in the history of David's troubles. Adullam, Ziph, Keilah, Maon, Engedi, Ziklag, here reckoned in this tribe, were places near which David had most of his haunts; for, though sometimes Saul drove him out from the inheritance of the Lord, yet he kept as close to it as he could. The wilderness of Judah he frequented much, and in it John Baptist preached, and there the kingdom of heaven commenced, . The riches of this country no doubt answered Jacob's blessing of this tribe, that he should wash his garments in wine, . And, in general, Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise, not envy.

Recommended reading

More for Joshua 15:20-63

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Joshua 15:1-63EXPOSITION THE LOT OF JUDAH.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Joshua 15:1-63The inheritance of Judah. This chapter does not suggest much matter for homiletic treatment. The chief points to be noticed are HOMILIES BY J. WAITEJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Joshua 15:20-63Here is a list of the cities of Judah. But we do not here find Bethlehem, afterwards the city of David, and ennobled by the birth of our Lord Jesus in it. That city, which, at the best, was but little among the thousand…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Joshua 15:20This is the inheritance. The territory of Judah is divided into four parts, in the summary which follows: the "south," the "valley," the "mountains," and the "wilderness." Tribe. Here מַטֶּה (see note Joshua 13:29).Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Joshua 15:21Coast. Rather, border (see note Joshua 15:4). Southward. The term here used (see above, Joshua 15:19) for "south" is the one which has the signification of dryness. It is, however, occasionally used in a less strict sen…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Joshua 15:22Their villages (see note Joshua 13:28).Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Joshua 15:22Kinah. Knobel suggests that this was the city of the Kenites, a supposition which derives some support from 1:16 and 1 Samuel 15:6.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Joshua 15:24Telem. This is identified by Knobel with the Telaim mentioned in 1 Samuel 15:4. Conder, in his 'Handbook,' supports this view, but nothing more is known of the place.Joseph S. Exell and contributors