Bible Commentary

Leviticus 13:4-8

The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:4-8

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

In case the symptoms are not decisive, then the priest shall shut up him that hath the plague seven days. The words thus translated would perhaps be better rendered, then the priest shall bind up the part affected for seven days.

The priest is to delay his judgment for a week, and, if necessary, for a second week, during which period the patient is, according to the rendering, either to be confined to his house or, more probably, to have the spot bandaged.

Whether the disease be or be not leprosy will probably have declared itself by the end of that time; and if the plague be somewhat dark on the fourteenth day, that is, if it has begun to lose its colour and to fade away, and has not spread in the skin, the priest is to decide that it is not real leprosy, and pronounce the man clean.

He is still, however, to be kept under supervision, and if the spot is found to spread, he is to be pronounced unclean, as it is proved to be a leprosy.

Recommended reading

More for Leviticus 13:4-8

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Leviticus 13:1-17Leviticus 13:1-17 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe plague of leprosy was an uncleanness, rather than a disease. Christ is said to cleanse lepers, not to cure them. Common as the leprosy was among the Hebrews, during and after their residence in Egypt, we have no rea…The Law Concerning Leprosy. (b. c. 1490.)Leviticus 13:1-17 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE LAW CONCERNING LEPROSY. (B. C. 1490.) I. Concerning the plague of leprosy we may observe in general, 1. That it was rather an uncleanness than a disease; or, at least, so the law considered it, and therefore employe…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59Leviticus 13:1-59 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe priest's adjudication. We have considered the plague of leprosy as an emblem of sin; the adjudication upon it will suggest thoughts concerning the treatment of sin. In this business the principal actor was the pries…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-46Leviticus 13:1-46 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION UNCLEANNESS DERIVED FROM LEPROSY OR CONTACT WITH LEPERS AND LEPROUS THINGS (Leviticus 13:1-59, Leviticus 14:1-57). A third cause of uncleanness is found in a third class of offensive or repulsive objects. The…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59Leviticus 13:1-59 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe diagnosis of sin as illustrated in the leprosy. cf. 2 Kings 5:1-27 : Psalms 88:1-18; Matthew 8:1-4; Luke 5:12-15. The preceding chapter brings forward sin as an inheritance through ordinary generation. No thorough s…The Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59Leviticus 13:1-59 · The Pulpit CommentaryLeprosy. That leprosy is a type of sin is evident from David's allusion in confessing his own horrible offenses (see Psalms 51:7)? This also appears from the words of Jesus to the only leper, out of the ten cleansed by…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Leviticus 13:1-17The plague of leprosy was an uncleanness, rather than a disease. Christ is said to cleanse lepers, not to cure them. Common as the leprosy was among the Hebrews, during and after their residence in Egypt, we have no rea…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Law Concerning Leprosy. (b. c. 1490.)THE LAW CONCERNING LEPROSY. (B. C. 1490.) I. Concerning the plague of leprosy we may observe in general, 1. That it was rather an uncleanness than a disease; or, at least, so the law considered it, and therefore employe…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59Leprosy. That leprosy is a type of sin is evident from David's allusion in confessing his own horrible offenses (see Psalms 51:7)? This also appears from the words of Jesus to the only leper, out of the ten cleansed by…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59The priest's adjudication. We have considered the plague of leprosy as an emblem of sin; the adjudication upon it will suggest thoughts concerning the treatment of sin. In this business the principal actor was the pries…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-59The diagnosis of sin as illustrated in the leprosy. cf. 2 Kings 5:1-27 : Psalms 88:1-18; Matthew 8:1-4; Luke 5:12-15. The preceding chapter brings forward sin as an inheritance through ordinary generation. No thorough s…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:1-46EXPOSITION UNCLEANNESS DERIVED FROM LEPROSY OR CONTACT WITH LEPERS AND LEPROUS THINGS (Leviticus 13:1-59, Leviticus 14:1-57). A third cause of uncleanness is found in a third class of offensive or repulsive objects. The…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Leviticus 13:5The chosen type of sin-its social aspect. We have seen (vide previous Homily) how true a picture is leprosy of sin in its individual aspect; we now regard the subject in its more social aspect. What this terrible diseas…Joseph S. Exell and contributors