Bible Commentary

Job 22:5-14

Matthew Henry on Job 22:5-14

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

Eliphaz brought heavy charges against Job, without reason for his accusations, except that Job was visited as he supposed God always visited every wicked man. He charges him with oppression, and that he did harm with his wealth and power in the time of his prosperity.

Recommended reading

More for Job 22:5-14

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryCensorious and uncharitable reasoning. Eliphaz again takes up the word. He does not contest Job's position, that life presents many examples of the prosperity of the godless, and of the calamities of the godly, but he s…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryEliphaz returns to the attack, but with observations that are at first strangely pointless and irrelevant, e.g. on the unprofitableness of man to God (verses l, 2), and on the slight importance of Job's case (verse 3).…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:2-11Job 22:2-11 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe impartiality of the Divine judgment. Eliphaz knows of no tense for suffering but sin. Doubtless sin—transgression of Divine laws—does lie deeply buried in the causes of human suffering. This is the fruitful seed fro…Job Accused of Various Crimes. (b. c. 1520.)Job 22:5-14 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleJOB ACCUSED OF VARIOUS CRIMES. (B. C. 1520.) Eliphaz and his companions had condemned Job, in general, as a wicked man and a hypocrite; but none of them had descended to particulars, nor drawn up any articles of impeach…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:5-20Job 22:5-20 · The Pulpit CommentaryEliphaz to Job: 2. A false accusation. I. A CHARGE OF FLAGRANT IMMORALITY. 1. Generally preferred. (Verse 5.) All sin may be justly characterized as great, being committed against a great God, a great Law, great light,…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Censorious and uncharitable reasoning. Eliphaz again takes up the word. He does not contest Job's position, that life presents many examples of the prosperity of the godless, and of the calamities of the godly, but he s…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Eliphaz returns to the attack, but with observations that are at first strangely pointless and irrelevant, e.g. on the unprofitableness of man to God (verses l, 2), and on the slight importance of Job's case (verse 3).…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:2-11The impartiality of the Divine judgment. Eliphaz knows of no tense for suffering but sin. Doubtless sin—transgression of Divine laws—does lie deeply buried in the causes of human suffering. This is the fruitful seed fro…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryJob Accused of Various Crimes. (b. c. 1520.)JOB ACCUSED OF VARIOUS CRIMES. (B. C. 1520.) Eliphaz and his companions had condemned Job, in general, as a wicked man and a hypocrite; but none of them had descended to particulars, nor drawn up any articles of impeach…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:5-20Eliphaz to Job: 2. A false accusation. I. A CHARGE OF FLAGRANT IMMORALITY. 1. Generally preferred. (Verse 5.) All sin may be justly characterized as great, being committed against a great God, a great Law, great light,…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:5Is not thy wickedness great? Judging from the greatness of Job's punishment, Eliphaz concludes, logically from his premisses, that his wickedness must be commensurate. He must have been guilty of almost every form of il…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:6For thou hast taken a pledge from thy brother for nought; i.e. thou hast lent to thy brother on pledge, without reasonable cause, when thou weft rich enough to need no security (comp. Nehemiah 5:2-11). And stripped the…Joseph S. Exell and contributors