Bible Commentary

Job 22:4

The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:4

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Will he reprove thee for fear of thee? rather, Is it for thy fear of him that he reproveth thee? Surely not. If he reproves thee, it must be because thou fearest him not. The fact of thy reproof is sure evidence of the fact of thy guilt.

Will he enter with thee into judgment? rather, that he entereth with thee into judgment (see the Revised Version).

Recommended reading

More for Job 22:4

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Matthew Henry on Job 22:1-4Job 22:1-4 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryEliphaz considers that, because Job complained so much of his afflictions, he thought God was unjust in afflicting him; but Job was far from thinking so. What Eliphaz says, is unjustly applied to Job, but it is very tru…Third Address of Eliphaz. (b. c. 1520.)Job 22:1-4 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHIRD ADDRESS OF ELIPHAZ. (B. C. 1520.) Eliphaz here insinuates that, because Job complained so much of his afflictions, he thought God was unjust in afflicting him; but it was a strained innuendo. Job was far from thin…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryCensorious and uncharitable reasoning. Eliphaz again takes up the word. He does not contest Job's position, that life presents many examples of the prosperity of the godless, and of the calamities of the godly, but he s…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryEliphaz returns to the attack, but with observations that are at first strangely pointless and irrelevant, e.g. on the unprofitableness of man to God (verses l, 2), and on the slight importance of Job's case (verse 3).…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-4Job 22:1-4 · The Pulpit CommentaryEliphaz to Job: the third colloquy: the second controversy: 1. A fallacious syllogism. I. A SOUND PREMISS. That God's government of mankind is entirely disinterested, his judicial retributions not being affected by cons…
commentaryMatthew Henry on Job 22:1-4Eliphaz considers that, because Job complained so much of his afflictions, he thought God was unjust in afflicting him; but Job was far from thinking so. What Eliphaz says, is unjustly applied to Job, but it is very tru…Matthew HenrycommentaryThird Address of Eliphaz. (b. c. 1520.)THIRD ADDRESS OF ELIPHAZ. (B. C. 1520.) Eliphaz here insinuates that, because Job complained so much of his afflictions, he thought God was unjust in afflicting him; but it was a strained innuendo. Job was far from thin…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-4Eliphaz to Job: the third colloquy: the second controversy: 1. A fallacious syllogism. I. A SOUND PREMISS. That God's government of mankind is entirely disinterested, his judicial retributions not being affected by cons…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Censorious and uncharitable reasoning. Eliphaz again takes up the word. He does not contest Job's position, that life presents many examples of the prosperity of the godless, and of the calamities of the godly, but he s…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Eliphaz returns to the attack, but with observations that are at first strangely pointless and irrelevant, e.g. on the unprofitableness of man to God (verses l, 2), and on the slight importance of Job's case (verse 3).…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:2-11The impartiality of the Divine judgment. Eliphaz knows of no tense for suffering but sin. Doubtless sin—transgression of Divine laws—does lie deeply buried in the causes of human suffering. This is the fruitful seed fro…Joseph S. Exell and contributors