Bible Commentary

Nehemiah 13:11

The Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:11

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Forsaking the house of God.

"Why is the house of God forsaken?" The question addressed by Nehemiah to the rulers may well have had respect at once to their own neglect, the withholding of contributions by the people, and the consequent abandonment of the temple by the Levites. We may apply it to the neglect to attend and support public worship by a large proportion of the population of our country. It is—

I. A QUESTION FOR MINISTERS. They have the greatest power to attract to, or repel from, the house of God. Let them ask whether the house of God may not be forsaken on account of defects in—

1. Their preaching. Let them consider whether it is what it ought to be in—

2. Their conduct. Inconsistancies of character, indolence, self-indulgence, unapproachableness, priestly pretensions, airs of infallible authority, mercenariness, all tend to alienate the people from the sanctuary. Neglect of pastoral visitation, whether through indifference, or indolence, or preference for other pursuits, or being too much occupied with the business of religion, may have a like effect. Or people may feel no interest in ministers and their teaching because ministers show no interest in their general well-being.

II. A QUESTION FOR CONGREGATIONS. Defects in those who do attend Divine service may have much to do with the absence of others. Let them consider whether they are wanting in—

1. Due support and encouragement of their ministers. Pecuniary support; sympathy and co-operation in efforts for the good of those without; encouragement of a style of preaching adapted to interest them; avoidance of unnecessary demands on the time and strength of their pastors. A minister's power of usefulness depends largely on the temper and conduct towards him of his congregation.

2. Care to make the services attractive. By due attention to the building, the singing, etc.

3. Provision of sufficient and suitable accommodation.

4. Efforts to induce the neglecters of public worship to attend.

5. Hearty welcome of those who are induced to attend.

6. A life fitted to recommend religion. In their general conduct. In their families. In their relations to those around, as merchants, tradesmen, employers of labour, etc. In the Church: unity, peace, earnestness.

III. A QUESTION FOR THOSE WHO NEGLECT PUBLIC WORSHIP.

1. Partially. Why not regular and constant in attendance? If attendance be a duty at all, it must be a duty to be regular. If occasional attendance be good, constant would be better. Irregularity reveals want of religious principle in the matter, and that no spiritual profit has yet been received by attendance. It discourages ministers and congregations, hinders the salvation of those who are guilty of it, injures their families, and sets an evil example.

2. Wholly. Why do you forsake the house of God? Is it that you feel no interest in what is said and done there? This reveals a state of heart deplorable and perilous; alienation from God, indifference to your highest welfare, unfitness for heaven. Is it that you prefer the society and habits of the ungodly, or fear their ridicule? But will you sacrifice your souls to them? Can you think with pleasure of sharing their future lot? Is it that, wearied with the toils of the week, you think yourself entitled to spend the Lord's day in idle repose? Its hours are sufficient for both rest and public worship, and the engagements of God's house are themselves restful. Is it that you dislike some who attend Divine worship, or think them to be hypocrites? But, supposing you to be right in your judgment, you ought not to condemn and separate from all on account of the faults of a few; and their wrong conduct in one direction is no excuse for your going wrong in another; and if sincere in worship, you will be blessed, whatever becomes of them. Do you say that you can read your Bible and worship God at home? It is to be hoped that you do; but if it were to good purpose, you would surely value the exercises of public worship, and the opportunities and helps which it affords. Do consider anew the reasons for not forsaking God's house.

Recommended reading

More for Nehemiah 13:11

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:1-31Nehemiah 13:1-31 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe blessing of God on an active life founded upon his word. I. THE TRUE RELIGIOUS REFORMATION, both negative and positive. 1. Abuses must be vigorously attacked and cleansed away. The house of God has to be purified of…The Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:1-31Nehemiah 13:1-31 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION NEHEMIAH'S EFFORTS FOR THE REFORM OF RELIGION (Nehemiah 13:1-31). After having exercised the office of governor for twelve years, from b.c. 444 to b.c. 432, Nehemiah had had occasion to visit the Persian cour…Matthew Henry on Nehemiah 13:10-14Nehemiah 13:10-14 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryIf a sacred character will not keep men from setting an evil example, it must not shelter any one from deserved blame and punishment. The Levites had been wronged; their portions had not been given them. They were gone…Abuses Rectified. (b. c. 434.)Nehemiah 13:10-14 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleABUSES RECTIFIED. (B. C. 434.) Here is another grievance redressed by Nehemiah. I. The Levites had been wronged. This was the grievance: their portions had not been given them, Nehemiah 13:10. Perhaps Tobiah, when he to…The Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:10-14Nehemiah 13:10-14 · The Pulpit CommentaryPractical Christian wisdom. Nehemiah must have been shocked indeed to find on his return to Jerusalem (verse 7) what a sad relapse had taken place during his absence from the city. Most painful of all must it have been…The Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:10-14Nehemiah 13:10-14 · The Pulpit CommentarySuspended ministrations restored. Nehemiah, on his return, soon discovers another serious evil which his absence had occasioned; and, with his usual promptness, ability, and energy, corrects it. I. THE SERIOUS IRREGULAR…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:1-31The blessing of God on an active life founded upon his word. I. THE TRUE RELIGIOUS REFORMATION, both negative and positive. 1. Abuses must be vigorously attacked and cleansed away. The house of God has to be purified of…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:1-31EXPOSITION NEHEMIAH'S EFFORTS FOR THE REFORM OF RELIGION (Nehemiah 13:1-31). After having exercised the office of governor for twelve years, from b.c. 444 to b.c. 432, Nehemiah had had occasion to visit the Persian cour…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Nehemiah 13:10-14If a sacred character will not keep men from setting an evil example, it must not shelter any one from deserved blame and punishment. The Levites had been wronged; their portions had not been given them. They were gone…Matthew HenrycommentaryAbuses Rectified. (b. c. 434.)ABUSES RECTIFIED. (B. C. 434.) Here is another grievance redressed by Nehemiah. I. The Levites had been wronged. This was the grievance: their portions had not been given them, Nehemiah 13:10. Perhaps Tobiah, when he to…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:10-14Practical Christian wisdom. Nehemiah must have been shocked indeed to find on his return to Jerusalem (verse 7) what a sad relapse had taken place during his absence from the city. Most painful of all must it have been…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:10-14Suspended ministrations restored. Nehemiah, on his return, soon discovers another serious evil which his absence had occasioned; and, with his usual promptness, ability, and energy, corrects it. I. THE SERIOUS IRREGULAR…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Nehemiah 13:11Then contended I with the rulers. While the guilt of profaning the temple lay especially with the priestly class, that of withholding the tithes was mainly chargeable on the "rulers," or "nobles." These persons, as weal…Joseph S. Exell and contributors