Bible Commentary

Job 22:7

The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:7

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

Thou hast not given water to the weary to drink. To give water to the thirsty was regarded in the East as one of the most elementary duties of man to man. The self-justification of the dead in the Egyptian Hades contained the following passage: "I gave my bread to the hungry, and drink to him that was athirst; I clothed the naked with garments; I sheltered the wanderer" ('Ritual of the Dead,' ch.

CXXV. § 38). The same claim appears continually on Egyptian tombs. "All men respected me," we read on one; "I gave water to the thirsty; I set the wanderer in his path; I took away the oppressor, and put a stop to violence".

In the proverbs assigned to Solomon, "which the men of Hezekiah copied out" (), the duty was declared to be one owed even to enemies (see , "If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink").

Isaiah notices it as praiseworthy in the Temanites (Eliphaz's people), that they "brought water to him that was thirsty' and prevented with their bread him that fled" (). Jael is praised for going further than this: He asked water, and she gave him milk; she brought forth butter in a lordly dish" ( 5:25).

And thou hast withholden bread from the hungry. Later on Job absolutely denies this, as well as many of the other charges. "If I have withheld," he says, "the poor from their desire, or have caused the eyes of the widow to fail; or have eaten my morsel myself alone, and the fatherless hath not eaten thereof," then let mine arm fall from my shoulder-blade, and mine arm be broken from the bone" ().

Recommended reading

More for Job 22:7

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryCensorious and uncharitable reasoning. Eliphaz again takes up the word. He does not contest Job's position, that life presents many examples of the prosperity of the godless, and of the calamities of the godly, but he s…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Job 22:1-30 · The Pulpit CommentaryEliphaz returns to the attack, but with observations that are at first strangely pointless and irrelevant, e.g. on the unprofitableness of man to God (verses l, 2), and on the slight importance of Job's case (verse 3).…The Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:2-11Job 22:2-11 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe impartiality of the Divine judgment. Eliphaz knows of no tense for suffering but sin. Doubtless sin—transgression of Divine laws—does lie deeply buried in the causes of human suffering. This is the fruitful seed fro…Matthew Henry on Job 22:5-14Job 22:5-14 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryEliphaz brought heavy charges against Job, without reason for his accusations, except that Job was visited as he supposed God always visited every wicked man. He charges him with oppression, and that he did harm with hi…Job Accused of Various Crimes. (b. c. 1520.)Job 22:5-14 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleJOB ACCUSED OF VARIOUS CRIMES. (B. C. 1520.) Eliphaz and his companions had condemned Job, in general, as a wicked man and a hypocrite; but none of them had descended to particulars, nor drawn up any articles of impeach…
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Censorious and uncharitable reasoning. Eliphaz again takes up the word. He does not contest Job's position, that life presents many examples of the prosperity of the godless, and of the calamities of the godly, but he s…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:1-30Eliphaz returns to the attack, but with observations that are at first strangely pointless and irrelevant, e.g. on the unprofitableness of man to God (verses l, 2), and on the slight importance of Job's case (verse 3).…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:2-11The impartiality of the Divine judgment. Eliphaz knows of no tense for suffering but sin. Doubtless sin—transgression of Divine laws—does lie deeply buried in the causes of human suffering. This is the fruitful seed fro…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Job 22:5-14Eliphaz brought heavy charges against Job, without reason for his accusations, except that Job was visited as he supposed God always visited every wicked man. He charges him with oppression, and that he did harm with hi…Matthew HenrycommentaryJob Accused of Various Crimes. (b. c. 1520.)JOB ACCUSED OF VARIOUS CRIMES. (B. C. 1520.) Eliphaz and his companions had condemned Job, in general, as a wicked man and a hypocrite; but none of them had descended to particulars, nor drawn up any articles of impeach…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:5-20Eliphaz to Job: 2. A false accusation. I. A CHARGE OF FLAGRANT IMMORALITY. 1. Generally preferred. (Verse 5.) All sin may be justly characterized as great, being committed against a great God, a great Law, great light,…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Job 22:7Help for the needy. I. THIS IS NATURAL. God has made us mutually dependent on one another. In social order there is an interchange of service, and the general life of the community is simply maintained by people helping…Joseph S. Exell and contributors