Bible Commentary

Genesis 3:1-5

Matthew Henry on Genesis 3:1-5

Matthew Henry Concise Commentary · Matthew Henry · CC0 1.0 Universal

Satan assaulted our first parents, to draw them to sin, and the temptation proved fatal to them. The tempter was the devil, in the shape and likeness of a serpent. Satan's plan was to draw our first parents to sin, and so to separate between them and their God.

Thus the devil was from the beginning a murderer, and the great mischief maker. The person tempted was the woman: it was Satan's policy to enter into talk with her when she was alone. There are many temptations to which being alone gives great advantage; but the communion of saints tends very much to their strength and safety.

Satan took advantage by finding her near the forbidden tree. They that would not eat the forbidden fruit, must not come near the forbidden tree. Satan tempted Eve, that by her he might tempt Adam. It is his policy to send temptations by hands we do not suspect, and by those that have most influence upon us.

Satan questioned whether it were a sin or not, to eat of this tree. He did not disclose his design at first, but he put a question which seemed innocent. Those who would be safe, need to be shy of talking with the tempter.

He quoted the command wrong. He spoke in a taunting way. The devil, as he is a liar, so he is a scoffer from the beginning; and scoffers are his children. It is the craft of Satan to speak of the Divine law as uncertain or unreasonable, and so to draw people to sin; it is our wisdom to keep up a firm belief of God's command, and a high respect for it.

Has God said, Ye shall not lie, nor take his name in vain, nor be drunk, &c.? Yes, I am sure he has, and it is well said; and by his grace I will abide by it. It was Eve's weakness to enter into this talk with the serpent: she might have perceived by his question, that he had no good design, and should therefore have started back.

Satan teaches men first to doubt, and then to deny. He promises advantage from their eating this fruit. He aims to make them discontented with their present state, as if it were not so good as it might be, and should be.

No condition will of itself bring content, unless the mind be brought to it. He tempts them to seek preferment, as if they were fit to be gods. Satan ruined himself by desiring to be like the Most High, therefore he sought to infect our first parents with the same desire, that he might ruin them too.

And still the devil draws people into his interest, by suggesting to them hard thoughts of God, and false hopes of advantage by sin. Let us, therefore, always think well of God as the best good, and think ill of sin as the worst evil: thus let us resist the devil, and he will flee from us.

Recommended reading

More for Genesis 3:1-5

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Tempter's Subtlety; The Tempter's Importunity (b. c. 4004.)Genesis 3:1-5 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE TEMPTER'S SUBTLETY; THE TEMPTER'S IMPORTUNITY (B. C. 4004.) We have here an account of the temptation with which Satan assaulted our first parents, to draw them into sin, and which proved fatal to them. Here observe…The Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7Genesis 3:1-7 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITIONThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7Genesis 3:1-7 · The Pulpit CommentaryHow long the paradisiacal state of innocence and felicity continued the historian does not declare, probably as not falling within the scope of his immediate design. Psalms 49:12 has been thought, though without suffici…The Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1Genesis 3:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryNow (literally, and) the serpent. Nachash, from nachash— (a) To make naked; whence atom, plural arumim, naked (Genesis 2:25). (b) To crafty (1 Samuel 23:22). If applied to the serpent in the sense of πανοῦ ργος (Aquila…The Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1Genesis 3:1 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe tempter. I. WHO TEMPTS? 1. Not the mere serpent. 2. A higher power of evil. 3. This higher power a person. 4. The leader of the fallen angels. II. WHY PERMITTED? Easy to see why moved; why permitted, a mystery. But…The Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7Genesis 3:1-7 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe moral chaos before the moral restoration. Hitherto the moral nature of man may be said to be absorbed in his religious nature. He has held intercourse with his Creator. He has ruled earth as "the paragon of animals.…
commentaryThe Tempter's Subtlety; The Tempter's Importunity (b. c. 4004.)THE TEMPTER'S SUBTLETY; THE TEMPTER'S IMPORTUNITY (B. C. 4004.) We have here an account of the temptation with which Satan assaulted our first parents, to draw them into sin, and which proved fatal to them. Here observe…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7The moral chaos before the moral restoration. Hitherto the moral nature of man may be said to be absorbed in his religious nature. He has held intercourse with his Creator. He has ruled earth as "the paragon of animals.…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1The tempter. I. WHO TEMPTS? 1. Not the mere serpent. 2. A higher power of evil. 3. This higher power a person. 4. The leader of the fallen angels. II. WHY PERMITTED? Easy to see why moved; why permitted, a mystery. But…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1Now (literally, and) the serpent. Nachash, from nachash— (a) To make naked; whence atom, plural arumim, naked (Genesis 2:25). (b) To crafty (1 Samuel 23:22). If applied to the serpent in the sense of πανοῦ ργος (Aquila…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:1-7How long the paradisiacal state of innocence and felicity continued the historian does not declare, probably as not falling within the scope of his immediate design. Psalms 49:12 has been thought, though without suffici…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:4The tempter's chief weapon. Narrative of the fall is of interest not only as the record of how mankind became sinful, but as showing the working of that "lie" (2 Thessalonians 2:11) by which the tempter continually seek…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Genesis 3:4And the serpent said unto the woman. "As God had preached to Adam, so Satan now also preaches to Eve … The object of Satan was to draw away Eve by his word or saying from that which God had said" (Luther). Ye shall not…Joseph S. Exell and contributors