Bible Commentary

Matthew 12:1

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

At that time (, note) Jesus went ( ἐπορεύθη). It has been suggested that he was now on his way to the synagogue spoken of in (but see note there). Wherever he was going, it must have been within about three quarters of a mile distance (two thousand cubits; see Dr.

Lumby, on , "a sabbath day's journey;" and Schurer, II. 2:102). On the sabbath day. Defined in the Received Text of Luke by the anomalous term "second-first," for the genesis of which see especially Westcott and Hort, 'App.'

Through the corn; the corn-fields (Revised Version, as also Authorized Version in the parallel passages). If it was barley harvest, the time would be probably the beginning of May; if wheat harvest, as seems more likely, about the beginning of June.

And his disciples were a hungred. So that it was not for his own sake that our Lord acted as he did. And began. They could therefore hardly have eaten much when the complaint was made. To pluck the ears of corn, and to eat.

It was legal to pluck corn from a field through which one passed (), and it is said to be allowed still; but as it was held by the scribes to be a form of reaping, and perhaps of threshing also, it was considered illegal on the sabbath (cf.

Edersheim, 'Life,' 2.56).

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 12:1

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

commentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 12:1-8Being in the corn-fields, the disciples began to pluck the ears of corn: the law of God allowed it, De 23:25. This was slender provision for Christ and his disciples; but they were content with it. The Pharisees did not…Matthew HenrycommentaryChrist Vindicates His DisciplesCHRIST VINDICATES HIS DISCIPLES. The Jewish teachers had corrupted many of the commandments, by interpreting them more loosely than they were intended; a mistake which Christ discovered and rectified (Matthew 5:1-48) in…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-50The opposition that our Lord met withJoseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-45(1) Opposition from his enemies. (a) Conscious and wilful opposition (Matthew 12:1-37). ( α) As regards the sabbath (Matthew 12:1-14). ( β) An interlude. The evangelist sees in our Lord's behaviour the fulfilment of Isa…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-8Ritual and morals. The Pharisaic Jews are, in the previous chapter, upbraided for their obstinate impenitence. We find the same people here condemning the disciples of Christ as sabbath-breakers because they plucked ear…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-8The sabbath made for man. Note in introduction that the chiefest interest of this passage centres in the last verses of it, and in their combined moral aspects. The occasion of these must be esteemed, with certain other…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-14Christ the Lord of the sabbath. I. NECESSARY WORK MAY BE DONE ON THE SABBATH. 1. The accusation of the Pharisees. The Lord's disciples were hungry; they gathered the ears of corn. This was allowed by the Law (Deuteronom…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 12:1-13The sabbath. Six times was our Lord, either directly or through his disciples, charged with sabbath-breaking. In considering the manner in which he met the accusation, we must bear in mind that he was in a different rel…Joseph S. Exell and contributors