Bible Commentary

Matthew 18:23-35

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:23-35

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

The hard debtor.

This parable follows our Lord's answer to St. Peter's question about the limits of forgiveness. The great reason why we should forgive freely is that we have been freely forgiven much more than any men owe to us.

I. THE GREAT DEBT. This represents what the sinner owes to God. We pray that God will forgive us our debts (). Deficiencies of duty are like debts considered as arrears of payments. Positive transgressions are like debts, through our having wilfully appropriated what was not our own without paying for it. The accumulated omissions and offences make up the one consolidated debt of guilt.

1. Its immense size. Christ names a fabulous sum. There is no counting the accumulated sins of a lifetime.

2. Its full exposure. The miserable debtor had been postponing the evil day. Perhaps, as he had been left long to himself, he had begun to hope that he would never be called to account. But the day of reckoning came. That day will come forevery soul. Long delay means an aggravated debt.

II. THE DREADFUL PUNISHMENT. It was according to the stern legislation of antiquity, and Christ bases his parables on familiar aspects of life without thereby justifying the facts and usages that he describes. In the spiritual world great punishment is the due of great sin. A reaction against the physical horrors of the mediaeval hell has blinded our age to this fearful truth. Yet Christ frequently affirms it in calm, terrible language.

III. THE GENEROUS FORGIVENESS. In his dismay the debtor grovels at the feet of his lord, and foolishly offers to repay all if only the king will be patient and give him time. That is impossible, and the king knows it. We can never repay what we owe to God. If his mercy only took the form of staying execution, at best it would only lead to a postponement of our doom. But the king forgave the debtor—forgave him completely. God forgives freely and fully. He acts royally. He does not spoil his gift by making it hut half a pardon. The great debt is completely cancelled to the penitent soul.

IV. THE SUBSEQUENT CRUELTY. The debtor's conduct was doubly odious. He had just been forgiven himself, and his debt was vastly greater than his fellow servant's. Yet he treated the poor man with brutal insistence, with cruel harshness. Nothing could be more odious than this conduct. But is it not just the conduct of every Christian who will not forgive his brother? The Christian should be melted by the sight of God's boundless clemency, by his own reception of it, and by the knowledge that God has forgiven him far more than anything he can ever have to forgive his brother.

V. THE FINAL DOOM. The king is justly angry. He recalls the pardon. He even has his wretched debtor put to torture. There are degrees of punishment in the future world, and the worse torment is reserved for those who, having accepted the mercy of God for themselves, have had no mercy on their brother-men.—W.F.A.

HOMILIES BY MARCUS DODS

Recommended reading

More for Matthew 18:23-35

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:1-35Matthew 18:1-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryDiscourse concerning the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, and the mutual duties of Christians. (Mark 9:33-50; Luke 9:46-50.)Matthew Henry on Matthew 18:21-35Matthew 18:21-35 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThough we live wholly on mercy and forgiveness, we are backward to forgive the offences of our brethren. This parable shows how much provocation God has from his family on earth, and how untoward his servants are. There…Christian Worshippers Encouraged; The Cruel CreditorMatthew 18:21-35 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleCHRISTIAN WORSHIPPERS ENCOURAGED; THE CRUEL CREDITOR. This part of the discourse concerning offences is certainly to be understood of personal wrongs, which is in our power to forgive. Now observe, I. Peter's question c…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35Matthew 18:21-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe unmerciful servant. The form of Peter's question shows that he still considered that to forgive was not the law of the kingdom, but a tentative measure which might at any moment be revoked, that underneath the forgi…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35Matthew 18:21-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe limits of mercy. Peter's question here was suggested by his Lord's doctrine concerning Christian judgment (Matthew 18:15-20). "Then came Peter," etc. The form of Peter's question may have been suggested by the custo…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35Matthew 18:21-35 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe pardon of injuries, and the parable of the unmerciful servant.
commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:1-35Discourse concerning the greatest in the kingdom of heaven, and the mutual duties of Christians. (Mark 9:33-50; Luke 9:46-50.)Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 18:21-35Though we live wholly on mercy and forgiveness, we are backward to forgive the offences of our brethren. This parable shows how much provocation God has from his family on earth, and how untoward his servants are. There…Matthew HenrycommentaryChristian Worshippers Encouraged; The Cruel CreditorCHRISTIAN WORSHIPPERS ENCOURAGED; THE CRUEL CREDITOR. This part of the discourse concerning offences is certainly to be understood of personal wrongs, which is in our power to forgive. Now observe, I. Peter's question c…Matthew HenrycommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35The pardon of injuries, and the parable of the unmerciful servant.Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35The limits of mercy. Peter's question here was suggested by his Lord's doctrine concerning Christian judgment (Matthew 18:15-20). "Then came Peter," etc. The form of Peter's question may have been suggested by the custo…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35The law of forgiveness. I. THE CONVERSATION WITH ST. PETER. 1. Peter's question. The Lord had intimated the duty of gentleness in dealing with offences. Every effort was to be used to reconcile the offending brother; he…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:21-35The unmerciful servant. The form of Peter's question shows that he still considered that to forgive was not the law of the kingdom, but a tentative measure which might at any moment be revoked, that underneath the forgi…Joseph S. Exell and contributorscommentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 18:23-35Christ illustrates his precept by the parable of the unmerciful servant, and the stern lesson which he himself enunciates at its close.Joseph S. Exell and contributors