The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:32

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public domain

I am ( ἐγω ì εἰμι). The quotation is from Exodus 3:6, where God gives himself this name, as the Eternal, Self-existent One. The God of Abraham … Jacob. These patriarchs had long been dead when this revelation was made; had they been annihilated, the Lord could not have called himself still their God.

By this utterance he implied that he had still to do with them—had a blessing and a reward which they were to receive, and which they must be alive to enjoy. How can they who are his cease to exist? They who are in personal relation and covenant with God cannot perish.

There were personal promises to Abraham, distinguished from those made to his seed (see Genesis 13:15; Genesis 15:7; Genesis 17:8, etc.), which were never fulfilled during his earthly life, and await realization in a future existence.

God was the patriarchs' Father, Saviour, Redeemer, Judge, Rewarder; he could not hold these relations to mere dust and ashes, but only to con-scions and responsible beings, existing, though in another condition, and in another portion of God's creation.

Thus was proved the continued existence and personality of the soul; and the resurrection of the body follows consequentially from this. Man is a complex being; he has body and soul, neither of which is complete without the other.

The soul is not perfect man without the body, which is its organ; the body is not perfect man without the soul, which animates it. In giving eternal life to man, God gives it to the creature as originally made, not to one portion only of his nature.

Of the living. "For," as St. Luke adds, "all live unto him." The so called dead are alive in God's view; they have an abiding relation to him, live in his world, which comprises the seen and unseen, the present and the future.

Titus St. Paul says (Romans 14:8, Romans 14:9), "Whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore or die, we are the Lord's. For to this end Christ both died and rose and revived, that he might be the Lord both of the dead and living."

More for Matthew 22:32

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46Matthew 22:1-46 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Matthew 22:15-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryQuestion of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…Matthew Henry on Matthew 22:23-33Matthew 22:23-33 · Matthew Henry Concise CommentaryThe doctrines of Christ displeased the infidel Sadducees, as well as the Pharisees and Herodians. He carried the great truths of the resurrection and a future state, further than they had yet been reveled. There is no a…The Question Respecting MarriageMatthew 22:23-33 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleTHE QUESTION RESPECTING MARRIAGE. We have here Christ's dispute with the Sadducees concerning the resurrection; it was the same day on which he was attacked by the Pharisees about paying tribute. Satan was now more busy…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33Matthew 22:23-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe resurrection of the dead. When Jesus had disposed of the Pharisees and Herodians, the Sadducees approached him. They were the physicists—the materialists—of their time, who did not believe in angels or spirits, and…The Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33Matthew 22:23-33 · The Pulpit CommentaryThird attack: The Sadducees and the resurrection. (Mark 12:18-27; Luke 20:27-40.)

commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:1-46EXPOSITIONJoseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:15-33Question of the Sadducees: "Whose shall she be?" The attempt of the Pharisees to ensnare our Lord in his talk was the result of a meeting called for the purpose of considering how they might silence a critic who was mak…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryMatthew Henry on Matthew 22:23-33The doctrines of Christ displeased the infidel Sadducees, as well as the Pharisees and Herodians. He carried the great truths of the resurrection and a future state, further than they had yet been reveled. There is no a…Matthew Henry commentaryThe Question Respecting MarriageTHE QUESTION RESPECTING MARRIAGE. We have here Christ's dispute with the Sadducees concerning the resurrection; it was the same day on which he was attacked by the Pharisees about paying tribute. Satan was now more busy…Matthew Henry commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33Third attack: The Sadducees and the resurrection. (Mark 12:18-27; Luke 20:27-40.)Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33The resurrection of the dead. When Jesus had disposed of the Pharisees and Herodians, the Sadducees approached him. They were the physicists—the materialists—of their time, who did not believe in angels or spirits, and…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:23-33The Sadducees. I. THEIR CASE OF CASUISTRY. 1. Their doctrine. They held that there was no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit (Acts 23:8). Some of them now came to Christ, asserting their unbelief. They had not hith…Joseph S. Exell and contributors commentaryThe Pulpit Commentary on Matthew 22:32The so called dead are alive. "God is not the God of the dead, but of the living." Having separated the idea of marriage from the conditions of the after life, our Lord took the opportunity of showing these questioners…Joseph S. Exell and contributors